Simon Maltais1, Nikhil P Jaik2, Irene D Feurer3, Mark A Wigger4, Thomas G DiSalvo4, Kelly H Schlendorf4, Rashid M Ahmad2, Daniel J Lenihan4, John M Stulak5, Mary E Keebler4. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: simon.maltais@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Department of Surgery and Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Department of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support is an accepted strategy to bridge patients to heart transplantation (HTx). Among mechanical circulatory support patients who go on to HTx, factors associated with improved graft survival have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, we identified adults who were treated with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH) before HTx. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify patient, donor, and device characteristics associated with graft survival. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and February 2012, 2,785 adults underwent HTx. Before HTx, 2,674 patients were treated with a LVAD (HeartMate XVE, 724; HeartMate II, 1,882; HeartWare, 68), and 111 were treated with a TAH. Follow-up averaged 25 ± 24 months. Gender mismatch occurred in 23%. Graft survival did not differ between LVAD groups (all p > 0.168), but TAH was associated with reduced graft survival compared with LVADs (p < 0.001). After controlling for device type (LVAD vs TAH), lower recipient pulmonary vascular resistance, shorter ischemic time, younger donor age, donor-to-recipient gender match, and higher donor-to-recipient body mass index ratio were independent predictors of longer graft survival (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAH was associated with reduced graft survival after transplant, and survival did not differ between the LVAD device groups. Additional variables that were independently associated with graft survival were donor age, recipient peripheral vascular resistance, ischemic time, gender match, and donor-to-recipient body mass index ratio. Recognition of these factors may inform decisions regarding device support and donor suitability.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support is an accepted strategy to bridge patients to heart transplantation (HTx). Among mechanical circulatory support patients who go on to HTx, factors associated with improved graft survival have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, we identified adults who were treated with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH) before HTx. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify patient, donor, and device characteristics associated with graft survival. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and February 2012, 2,785 adults underwent HTx. Before HTx, 2,674 patients were treated with a LVAD (HeartMate XVE, 724; HeartMate II, 1,882; HeartWare, 68), and 111 were treated with a TAH. Follow-up averaged 25 ± 24 months. Gender mismatch occurred in 23%. Graft survival did not differ between LVAD groups (all p > 0.168), but TAH was associated with reduced graft survival compared with LVADs (p < 0.001). After controlling for device type (LVAD vs TAH), lower recipient pulmonary vascular resistance, shorter ischemic time, younger donor age, donor-to-recipient gender match, and higher donor-to-recipient body mass index ratio were independent predictors of longer graft survival (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAH was associated with reduced graft survival after transplant, and survival did not differ between the LVAD device groups. Additional variables that were independently associated with graft survival were donor age, recipient peripheral vascular resistance, ischemic time, gender match, and donor-to-recipient body mass index ratio. Recognition of these factors may inform decisions regarding device support and donor suitability.
Authors: Ahmet Kilic; Sitaramesh Emani; Chittoor B Sai-Sudhakar; Robert S D Higgins; Bryan A Whitson Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Pavol Sajgalik; Chul-Ho Kim; John M Stulak; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Simon Maltais; David L Joyce; Lyle D Joyce; Bruce D Johnson; John A Schirger Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2018-10-12