Literature DB >> 23915554

Pain assessment methods in mechanical dysfunction.

A E Reading1.   

Abstract

This paper considers the reliability and validity of pain assessment methods in mechanical dysfunction. A distinction is drawn between measures of subjective report and those of pain behaviour. The latter is observable and therefore more amenable to direct study than subjective report. Measures of subjective report include rating scales, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and diary cards. Consideration is also given to personality assessment in this context. It is concluded that measurement needs to proceed from a number of standpoints, with the importance of each of these dependent upon the context. For chronic pain, emphasis on pain behaviours is appropriate.
Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 23915554     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(86)90150-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  1 in total

1.  Twenty years of multidisciplinary research and practice: the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation then and now.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Patricia A Findley; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.