Literature DB >> 23915488

Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.

Gabriela Ribeiro Ivo Rodrigues1, Natália Ramos, Doris Ruthi Lewis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The difference of characteristics (latency and amplitude) between toneburst and narrow CE-chirp stimuli on ABR recording was analyzed in normal hearing infants.
METHODS: 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded in 40 normal-hearing infants. The amplitude and latency parameters of the ABR were collected for each of the four stimulus levels: 80, 60, 40, and 20 dB nHL. Both stimuli started from 80 dB nHL using alternating polarity and the rates were both 27.1/s.
RESULTS: The toneburst latencies are greater than narrow band CE-chirp latencies for all intensities at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz (p < 0.001). However, at 4000 Hz this difference was not significant. At 500 Hz, wave V amplitude is larger for toneburst than narrow CE-chirp (p < 0.001) in 80 dB nHL. The difference between the two stimuli in 60 dB nHL was not significant (p = 0.495) and at 40 and 20 dB nHL the wave V narrow band CE-chirp amplitude is greater than toneburst amplitude (p < 0.001). At 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz there is no difference between the wave V toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp amplitudes at 80 dB nHL (p = 0.940; p = 0.776 and p = 0.217 respectively). On the other hand, in the levels to 60, 40 and 20 dB nHL, narrow band CE-chirp amplitudes are larger than toneburst amplitude (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Narrow band CE-chirp ABRs generates shorter latencies than the toneburst ABRs, especially to low frequencies. Higher amplitudes were found with narrow band CE-chirp stimuli for all frequencies tested, except to high levels.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brain stem responses; Children; Evoked response audiometry; Hearing thresholds

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23915488     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 2.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Normative Data of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Response to Chirp Stimulus.

Authors:  Ceren Karaçaylı; Fatma Ceyda Akın Öçal; Volkan Kenan Çoban; Bülent Satar
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 4.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  Using Narrow Band CE-Chirps to Elicit Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Naïma Deggouj; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Early definition of type, degree and audiogram shape in childhood hearing impairment.

Authors:  G Conti; R Gallus; A R Fetoni; B M Martina; E Muzzi; E Orzan; G Bastanza
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Lisa L Hunter; Deborah Hayes; Patricia A Roush; Kristin M Uhler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Optimizing Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials With Narrow Band CE-Chirps.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.