Literature DB >> 23915331

Performance evaluation of selected n95 respirators and surgical masks when challenged with aerosolized endospores and inert particles.

Craig S Davidson1, Christopher F Green, Shawn G Gibbs, Kendra K Schmid, Adelisa L Panlilio, Paul A Jensen, Pasquale V Scarpino.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess how the relative efficiency of N95 respirators and surgical masks might vary with different challenge aerosols, utilizing a standardized manikin head form as a surrogate to human participation. A Collision nebulizer aerosolized B. anthracis Sterne strain endospores and polystyrene latex (PSL) particles to evaluate 11 models of N95 respirators and surgical masks. An automated breathing simulator, calibrated to normal tidal volume and active breathing rate, mimicked human respiration. A manikin head form with N95 respirators or surgical masks, and manikin head form without N95 respirators or surgical masks were placed in the bioaerosol chamber. An AGI-30 sampler filled with phosphate buffered water was fitted behind the mouth of each manikin head form to collect endospore bioaerosol samples. PSL aerosols concentrations were quantified by an ARTI Hand Held Particle Counter. Geometric Mean (GM) relative efficiency of N95 respirators and surgical masks challenged with endospore bioaerosol ranged from 34-65%. In PSL aerosol experiments, GM relative efficiency ranged from 35-64% for 1.3 μm particles. GM filtration efficiency of all N95 and surgical N95 respirators filter media evaluated was ≥99% when challenged with particles ≥0.1 μm. GM filtration efficiency of surgical mask filter media ranged from 70-83% with particles ≥0.1 μm and 74-92% with 1.3 μm PSL particles. Relative efficiencies of N95 respirators and surgical masks challenged with aerosolized B. anthracis endospores and PSL were similar. Relative efficiency was similar between N95 respirators and surgical masks on a manikin head form despite clear differences in filtration efficiency. This study further highlights the importance of face seal leakage in the respiratory protection provided by N95 respirators, and demonstrates it on a human surrogate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23915331     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Smith; Colin C MacDougall; Jennie Johnstone; Ray A Copes; Brian Schwartz; Gary E Garber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Assessment of Two Personal Breathing Recording Devices in a Simulated Healthcare Environment.

Authors:  Jintuo Zhu; Xinjian He; Steven Guffey; Michael S Bergman; Eun G Lee; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2018

3.  Effectiveness of activated carbon masks in preventing anticancer drug inhalation.

Authors:  Junya Sato; Atushi Kogure; Kenzo Kudo
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2016-11-03

4.  Four-type of Masks and its Effectiveness Based on Reduced Level of Expiratory Carbon-monoxide.

Authors:  Noni Novisari Soeroso; Tengku Kemala Intan; M Ichwan; M Hanif Fadlurrahman; Fannie Rizki Ananda
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens.

Authors:  Thi Tham Nguyen; Graham R Johnson; Scott C Bell; Luke D Knibbs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Particle Filtration Efficiency Testing of Sterilization Wrap Masks.

Authors:  Destiny F Chau; Patrick O'Shaughnessy; Michael L Schmitz
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2020-12-22

7.  Reinventing Cloth Masks in the Face of Pandemics.

Authors:  Stephen Salter
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.