OBJECTIVE: Except for EGFR gene mutation, there is still lack of predictive factors for gefitinib activity as the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type (WT) EGFR or patients with mutant EGFR but showed poor response. Our purpose was to assess the predictive value of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and IGF-1R for gefitinib efficacy as the second-line treatment for NSCLC. METHODS: 53 advanced NSCLC patients who accepted gefitinib as the second-line treatment were enrolled in this study. Expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, and IGF-1R was determined by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene mutation was determined by liquidchip technique. RESULTS: The positive rate of EMT, IGF-1R, and EGFR gene mutation was 54.7%, 58.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. EMT (-) was positively correlated with EGFR gene mutation (p = .034) and EMT (+) was associated with IGF-1R (+) (p = .000). EMT (-) was associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) for all the 53 patients (41.7% vs. 6.9%, p = .024) and showed a higher ORR tendency than EMT (+) in EGFR mutation patients (50.0% vs. 28.6%) and WT EGFR patients (20.0% vs. 4.5%) (p > .05). EMT (-) showed a significant longer median survival time (MST) than EMT (+) for all 53 patients (8 months vs. 4 months) and WT EGFR patients (6 months vs. 3 months) (p < .05). IGF-1R (-) showed a higher ORR tendency than IGF-1R (+) in EGFR mutation patients (54% vs. 30%) and WT EGFR patients (18.2% vs. 4.8%) (p > .05). CONCLUSION: EMT is correlated with efficacy of gefitinib as the second-line treatment for NSCLC, and combined detection of EMT and IGF-1R may be used as new predictors besides EGFR mutation, especially for patients with WT EGFR.
OBJECTIVE: Except for EGFR gene mutation, there is still lack of predictive factors for gefitinib activity as the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type (WT) EGFR or patients with mutant EGFR but showed poor response. Our purpose was to assess the predictive value of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and IGF-1R for gefitinib efficacy as the second-line treatment for NSCLC. METHODS: 53 advanced NSCLCpatients who accepted gefitinib as the second-line treatment were enrolled in this study. Expression of E-cadherin, vimentin, and IGF-1R was determined by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene mutation was determined by liquidchip technique. RESULTS: The positive rate of EMT, IGF-1R, and EGFR gene mutation was 54.7%, 58.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. EMT (-) was positively correlated with EGFR gene mutation (p = .034) and EMT (+) was associated with IGF-1R (+) (p = .000). EMT (-) was associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) for all the 53 patients (41.7% vs. 6.9%, p = .024) and showed a higher ORR tendency than EMT (+) in EGFR mutation patients (50.0% vs. 28.6%) and WTEGFRpatients (20.0% vs. 4.5%) (p > .05). EMT (-) showed a significant longer median survival time (MST) than EMT (+) for all 53 patients (8 months vs. 4 months) and WTEGFRpatients (6 months vs. 3 months) (p < .05). IGF-1R (-) showed a higher ORR tendency than IGF-1R (+) in EGFR mutation patients (54% vs. 30%) and WTEGFRpatients (18.2% vs. 4.8%) (p > .05). CONCLUSION: EMT is correlated with efficacy of gefitinib as the second-line treatment for NSCLC, and combined detection of EMT and IGF-1R may be used as new predictors besides EGFR mutation, especially for patients with WTEGFR.
Authors: Icíar P López; Sergio Piñeiro-Hermida; Elvira Alfaro-Arnedo; Marta Canalejo; Carolina Gotera; Jesús Javier Sola; Alejandra Roncero; Germán Peces-Barba; Carlos Ruíz-Martínez; José G Pichel Journal: Oncogene Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 8.756
Authors: Christina Demuth; Anne Tranberg Madsen; Britta Weber; Lin Wu; Peter Meldgaard; Boe Sandahl Sorensen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.430