OBJECTIVES: Although perceiving one's social ties as sources of ambivalence has been linked to negative health outcomes, the more specific contexts by which such relationships influence health remain less studied. We thus examined if perceived spousal relationship quality in three theoretically important contexts (i.e., support, capitalization, everyday life) predicted inflammation. METHOD: Ninety-four married couples completed measures of perceived spousal positivity and negativity in support, capitalization, and everyday contexts. These scores were used to derive an index of relationship ambivalence whereby interactions were rated as containing both positive and negative aspects. Serum levels of IL-6, fibrinogen, and CRP were assessed from plasma. RESULTS: Perceiving ambivalence toward one's spouse in a support context was linked to greater inflammation even when considering health behaviors, relationship-specific romantic attachment style, spouse negativity/positivity ratings, and overall marital satisfaction. Perceiving ambivalence toward a spouse during capitalization predicted higher fibrinogen levels only, whereas no links were found with perceived spousal ambivalence in everyday life contexts. CONCLUSION: Perceptions of ambivalence during support may be a particularly important relational context in which marital ties influence health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVES: Although perceiving one's social ties as sources of ambivalence has been linked to negative health outcomes, the more specific contexts by which such relationships influence health remain less studied. We thus examined if perceived spousal relationship quality in three theoretically important contexts (i.e., support, capitalization, everyday life) predicted inflammation. METHOD: Ninety-four married couples completed measures of perceived spousal positivity and negativity in support, capitalization, and everyday contexts. These scores were used to derive an index of relationship ambivalence whereby interactions were rated as containing both positive and negative aspects. Serum levels of IL-6, fibrinogen, and CRP were assessed from plasma. RESULTS: Perceiving ambivalence toward one's spouse in a support context was linked to greater inflammation even when considering health behaviors, relationship-specific romantic attachment style, spouse negativity/positivity ratings, and overall marital satisfaction. Perceiving ambivalence toward a spouse during capitalization predicted higher fibrinogen levels only, whereas no links were found with perceived spousal ambivalence in everyday life contexts. CONCLUSION: Perceptions of ambivalence during support may be a particularly important relational context in which marital ties influence health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Bert N Uchino; Joshua Landvatter; Sierra Cronan; Emily Scott; Michael Papadakis; Timothy W Smith; Jos A Bosch; Samantha Joel Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Raphael M Herr; Frenk Van Harreveld; Bert N Uchino; Wendy C Birmingham; Adrian Loerbroks; Joachim E Fischer; Jos A Bosch Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-10-26