Literature DB >> 23914810

Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study.

Maggie Mort1, Celia Roberts, Jeannette Pols, Miquel Domenech, Ingunn Moser.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Telecare and telehealth developments have recently attracted much attention in research and service development contexts, where their evaluation has predominantly concerned effectiveness and efficiency. Their social and ethical implications, in contrast, have received little scrutiny.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an ethical framework for telecare systems based on analysis of observations of telecare-in-use and citizens' panel deliberations.
DESIGN: Ethnographic study (observation, work shadowing), interviews, older citizens' panels and a participative conference.
SETTING: Participants' homes, workplaces and familiar community venues in England, Spain, the Netherlands and Norway 2008-2011.
RESULTS: Older respondents expressed concerns that telecare might be used to replace face-to-face/hands-on care to cut costs. Citizens' panels strongly advocated ethical and social questions being considered in tandem with technical and policy developments. Older people are too often excluded from telecare system design, and installation is often wrongly seen as a one-off event. Some systems enhance self-care by increasing self-awareness, while others shift agency away from the older person, introducing new forms of dependency.
CONCLUSIONS: Telecare has care limitations; it is not a solution, but a shift in networks of relations and responsibilities. Telecare cannot be meaningfully evaluated as an entity, but rather in the situated relations people and technologies create together. Characteristics of ethical telecare include on-going user/carer engagement in decision making about systems: in-home system evolution with feedback opportunities built into implementation. System design should be horizontal, 'two-way'/interactive rather than vertical or 'one-way'. An ethical framework for telecare has been developed from these conclusions (Table 1).
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ageing; citizens’ panels; ethical framework; technology; telecare

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23914810      PMCID: PMC5060789          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  7 in total

1.  Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare.

Authors:  Carl May; Maggie Mort; Tracy Williams; Frances Mair; Linda Gask
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?

Authors:  Elham Kashefi; Maggie Mort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Daily contact with a nurse may be more important than high tech telecare.

Authors:  Nicholas J Sharvill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-02-07

4.  Show us the evidence for telehealth.

Authors:  Margaret McCartney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-18

5.  Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity?

Authors:  Maggie Mort; Celia Roberts; Blanca Callén
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2012-10-25

6.  Exploring public perspectives on e-health: findings from two citizen juries.

Authors:  Gerry King; David J Heaney; David Boddy; Catherine A O'Donnell; Julia S Clark; Frances S Mair
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Adam Steventon; Martin Bardsley; John Billings; Jennifer Dixon; Helen Doll; Shashi Hirani; Martin Cartwright; Lorna Rixon; Martin Knapp; Catherine Henderson; Anne Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jane Hendy; Stanton Newman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-06-21
  7 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Rural and remote care: Overcoming the challenges of distance.

Authors:  Donna Goodridge; Darcy Marciniuk
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 2.444

2.  Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.

Authors:  Rebecca Gathercole; Rosie Bradley; Emma Harper; Lucy Davies; Lynn Pank; Natalie Lam; Anna Davies; Emma Talbot; Emma Hooper; Rachel Winson; Bethany Scutt; Victoria Ordonez Montano; Samantha Nunn; Grace Lavelle; Matthew Lariviere; Shashivadan Hirani; Stefano Brini; Andrew Bateman; Peter Bentham; Alistair Burns; Barbara Dunk; Kirsty Forsyth; Chris Fox; Catherine Henderson; Martin Knapp; Iracema Leroi; Stanton Newman; John O'Brien; Fiona Poland; John Woolham; Richard Gray; Robert Howard
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  No Place Like Home? Surveillance and What Home Means in Old Age.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Andrew Sixsmith; Robert Beringer
Journal:  Can J Aging       Date:  2016-01-08

4.  'It was like he was in the room with us': patients' and carers' perspectives of telemedicine in acute stroke.

Authors:  Josephine Gibson; Elizabeth Lightbody; Alison McLoughlin; Joanna McAdam; Alison Gibson; Elaine Day; Jane Fitzgerald; Carl May; Chris Price; Hedley Emsley; Gary A Ford; Caroline Watkins
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Ethical considerations in design and implementation of home-based smart care for dementia.

Authors:  Christine Hine; Ramin Nilforooshan; Payam Barnaghi
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Rob Procter; Joe Wherton; Paul Sugarhood; Sue Hinder; Mark Rouncefield
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  'Massive potential' or 'safety risk'? Health worker views on telehealth in the care of older people and implications for successful normalization.

Authors:  Wendy Shulver; Maggie Killington; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  "Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices.

Authors:  Randi Stokke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences.

Authors:  J Harvey; S Dopson; R J McManus; J Powell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Sara Shaw; Joe Wherton; Gemma Hughes; Jenni Lynch; Christine A'Court; Sue Hinder; Nick Fahy; Emma Byrne; Alexander Finlayson; Tom Sorell; Rob Procter; Rob Stones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.