OBJECTIVES: Safety net health centers (SNHCs), which include federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) provide primary care for underserved, minority and low income patients. SNHCs across the country are in the process of adopting the patient centered medical home (PCMH) model, based on promising early implementation data from demonstration projects. However, previous demonstration projects have not focused on the safety net and we know little about PCMH transformation in SNHCs. DESIGN: This qualitative study characterizes early PCMH adoption experiences at SNHCs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 98 staff (administrators, providers, and clinical staff) at 20 of 65 SNHCs, from five states, who were participating in the first of a five-year PCMH collaborative, the Safety Net Medical Home Initiative. MAIN MEASURES: We conducted 30-45 minute, semi-structured telephone interviews. Interview questions addressed benefits anticipated, obstacles encountered, and lessons learned in transition to PCMH. RESULTS: Anticipated benefits for participating in the PCMH included improved staff satisfaction and patient care and outcomes. Obstacles included staff resistance and lack of financial support for PCMH functions. Lessons learned included involving a range of staff, anticipating resistance, and using data as frequent feedback. CONCLUSIONS: SNHCs encounter unique challenges to PCMH implementation, including staff turnover and providing care for patients with complex needs. Staff resistance and turnover may be ameliorated through improved health care delivery strategies associated with the PCMH. Creating predictable and continuous funding streams may be more fundamental challenges to PCMH transformation.
OBJECTIVES: Safety net health centers (SNHCs), which include federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) provide primary care for underserved, minority and low income patients. SNHCs across the country are in the process of adopting the patient centered medical home (PCMH) model, based on promising early implementation data from demonstration projects. However, previous demonstration projects have not focused on the safety net and we know little about PCMH transformation in SNHCs. DESIGN: This qualitative study characterizes early PCMH adoption experiences at SNHCs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 98 staff (administrators, providers, and clinical staff) at 20 of 65 SNHCs, from five states, who were participating in the first of a five-year PCMH collaborative, the Safety Net Medical Home Initiative. MAIN MEASURES: We conducted 30-45 minute, semi-structured telephone interviews. Interview questions addressed benefits anticipated, obstacles encountered, and lessons learned in transition to PCMH. RESULTS: Anticipated benefits for participating in the PCMH included improved staff satisfaction and patient care and outcomes. Obstacles included staff resistance and lack of financial support for PCMH functions. Lessons learned included involving a range of staff, anticipating resistance, and using data as frequent feedback. CONCLUSIONS: SNHCs encounter unique challenges to PCMH implementation, including staff turnover and providing care for patients with complex needs. Staff resistance and turnover may be ameliorated through improved health care delivery strategies associated with the PCMH. Creating predictable and continuous funding streams may be more fundamental challenges to PCMH transformation.
Authors: Thomas Bodenheimer; Margaret C Wang; Thomas G Rundall; Stephen M Shortell; Robin R Gillies; Nancy Oswald; Lawrence Casalino; James C Robinson Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Saf Date: 2004-09
Authors: Robert S Nocon; Ravi Sharma; Jonathan M Birnberg; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Sang Mee Lee; Marshall H Chin Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Diane R Rittenhouse; Lawrence P Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Bernard Lau Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Nakela L Cook; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Edward Guadagnoli; Bruce E Landon Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Robert A Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S Underwood; Aimee F Williams Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Robert J Reid; Paul A Fishman; Onchee Yu; Tyler R Ross; James T Tufano; Michael P Soman; Eric B Larson Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Robert S Nocon; Paige C Fairchild; Yue Gao; Kathryn E Gunter; Sang Mee Lee; Michael Quinn; Elbert S Huang; Marshall H Chin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Deborah Burnet; Kathryn E Gunter; Robert S Nocon; Yue Gao; Janel Jin; Paige Fairchild; Marshall H Chin Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Priscilla A Barnes; Erin M Staab; Amanda Campbell; Cindy Schaefer; Michael T Quinn; Arshiya A Baig Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Peter Mendel; Emily K Chen; Harold D Green; Courtney Armstrong; Justin W Timbie; Amii M Kress; Mark W Friedberg; Katherine L Kahn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah Derrett; Kathryn E Gunter; Ari Samaranayaka; Sara J Singer; Robert S Nocon; Michael T Quinn; Mary Breheny; Amanda Campbell; Cynthia T Schaefer; Loretta J Heuer; Marshall H Chin Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Peter Mendel; Jennifer O'Hora; Lily Zhang; Susan Stockdale; Elizabeth L Dixon; Jim Gilmore; Felica Jones; Andrea Jones; Pluscedia Williams; Mienah Zulfacar Sharif; Zoe Masongsong; Farbod Kadkhoda; Esmeralda Pulido; Bowen Chung; Kenneth B Wells Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2020-05-19
Authors: Lucinda B Leung; Arturo Vargas-Bustamante; Ana E Martinez; Xiao Chen; Hector P Rodriguez Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 3.402