OBJECTIVE: Epicardial fat is known to be thicker in White men than in Black men. The impact of sex, % body fat, and other anthropometric measures on epicardial fat thickness has not been described. Therefore we sought to evaluate how the racial differences in epicardial fat thickness would differ by these factors. METHODS: We used two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to measure the epicardial fat thickness in 150 patients who were admitted to our clinical decision unit for chest pain. Standard anthropometric measurements were performed and body mass index (BMI) and % body fat were calculated. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and multiple regression. RESULTS: Epicardial fat measured at the mid right ventricular wall was significantly greater in Whites than Blacks (4.9 +/- 2.1 mm vs 3.8 +/- 1.8 mm, for males, and 5.8 +/- 3.2 mm vs 3.7 +/- 1.7 mm, for females). The results from regression analysis showed that after controlling for age, sex, BMI and waist circumference, race remained a significant predictor of epicardial fat, with Whites having higher amounts of fat than Blacks. The difference by race remained even after controlling for % body fat, which was also a significant predictor. CONCLUSION: Anterior epicardial fat thickness is greater in White than Black men and women of the same race and is independent of anthropometric measurements and % body fat. Race may be an important consideration when analyzing the relationship between epicardial fat and cardiovascular risk.
OBJECTIVE: Epicardial fat is known to be thicker in White men than in Black men. The impact of sex, % body fat, and other anthropometric measures on epicardial fat thickness has not been described. Therefore we sought to evaluate how the racial differences in epicardial fat thickness would differ by these factors. METHODS: We used two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to measure the epicardial fat thickness in 150 patients who were admitted to our clinical decision unit for chest pain. Standard anthropometric measurements were performed and body mass index (BMI) and % body fat were calculated. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and multiple regression. RESULTS: Epicardial fat measured at the mid right ventricular wall was significantly greater in Whites than Blacks (4.9 +/- 2.1 mm vs 3.8 +/- 1.8 mm, for males, and 5.8 +/- 3.2 mm vs 3.7 +/- 1.7 mm, for females). The results from regression analysis showed that after controlling for age, sex, BMI and waist circumference, race remained a significant predictor of epicardial fat, with Whites having higher amounts of fat than Blacks. The difference by race remained even after controlling for % body fat, which was also a significant predictor. CONCLUSION: Anterior epicardial fat thickness is greater in White than Black men and women of the same race and is independent of anthropometric measurements and % body fat. Race may be an important consideration when analyzing the relationship between epicardial fat and cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Carrie Hanley; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Imke Janssen; Matthew J Budoff; Akira Sekikawa; Suresh Mulukutla; Samar R El Khoudary Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: S R El Khoudary; C Shin; K Masaki; K Miura; M Budoff; D Edmundowicz; S Kadowaki; E Barinas-Mitchell; A El-Saed; A Fujiyoshi; R W Evans; T Hisamatsu; T Ohkubo; B J Willcox; L H Kuller; H Ueshima; A Sekikawa Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Juan Salazar; Eliana Luzardo; José Carlos Mejías; Joselyn Rojas; Antonio Ferreira; José Ramón Rivas-Ríos; Valmore Bermúdez Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 1.866