| Literature DB >> 23913993 |
Emiko Takagi1, Yasuhiko Saito.
Abstract
Japan presents a unique social laboratory in which to examine how family support impacts on older adults' psychological wellbeing. This is because of its cultural climate where distinctively different expectations of old-age independence and the traditional norm of filial piety coexist. This study investigated how structural and functional dimensions of the family support of older Japanese parents influence their psychological morale, and whether the impacts of family support on parents' morale vary depending on the parents' belief in the traditional cultural norm of filial piety. Four waves of data from the Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging (NUJLSOA) collected in 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2006 were analysed. Combining the two- or three-year span of longitudinal data between each wave (N=3,882), an ordered logistic regression analysis was undertaken. The results reveal that although parents who were widowed or received emotional support from a child tended to report a lower level of morale, the negative influences of such support tended to be mitigated if the parent agreed with the traditional cultural norm of filial responsibilities. These results imply that the meaning and benefit of family support may differ depending on the degree to which Japanese older parents support the traditional norm of filial responsibilities.Entities:
Keywords: Japan; family; filial piety; psychological wellbeing; social support
Year: 2012 PMID: 23913993 PMCID: PMC3728917 DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X1200044X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ageing Soc ISSN: 0144-686X
Sample characteristics
| Variables | Range/categories | Mean (SD)/Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| PGC morale score (baseline) | 1–11 | 8.7 (2.2) |
| PGC morale score (ending year) | 1 (low morale) | 0.27 |
| 2 (middle morale) | 0.29 | |
| 3 (high morale) | 0.44 | |
| Age | 65–94 | 72.4 (5.6) |
| Gender (female) | Female=1, male=0 | 0.54 (0.50) |
| Rural residency | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.33 (0.47) |
| Household income (imputed) | 1 (less than US $6,250) to 13 (more than US $187,500) | 5.2 (2.3) |
| High school or higher | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.47 (0.50) |
| ADL difficulty (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.05 (0.22) |
| ADL difficulty (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.07 (0.26) |
| Filial responsibility | Disagree | 0.25 |
| Somewhat disagree | 0.16 | |
| Somewhat agree | 0.23 | |
| Agree | 0.36 |
Notes: N=2,380 (observations=3,882). ADL: activity of daily living. PGC: Philadelphia Geriatric Center. SD: standard deviation.
Social support
| Variables | Range/categories | Mean (SD)/Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| Structural social support: | ||
| Widowhood (baseline) | Widowed=1, not widowed=0 | 0.27 (0.45) |
| Widowhood (ending year) | Widowed=1, not widowed=0 | 0.30 (0.46) |
| Co-residence with adult child (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.53 (0.50) |
| Co-residence with adult child (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.52 (0.50) |
| Non-coresident child living in the same town (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.45 (0.50) |
| Non-coresident child living in the same town (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.46 (0.50) |
| Number of children | 1–8 | 2.4 (0.96) |
| Having at least one son | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.80 (0.40) |
| Functional social support: | ||
| Receiving support: | ||
| Financial support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.16 (0.39) |
| Financial support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.17 (0.37) |
| Instrumental support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.19 (0.40) |
| Instrumental support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.23 (0.42) |
| Emotional support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.23 (0.42) |
| Emotional support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.25 (0.43) |
| Number of support (baseline) | 1–7 | 0.87 (1.5) |
| Number of support (ending year) | 1–7 | 0.97 (1.6) |
| Providing support: | ||
| Financial support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.18 (0.38) |
| Financial support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.18 (0.38) |
| Instrumental support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.26 (0.44) |
| Instrumental support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.25 (0.43) |
| Emotional support (baseline) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.14 (0.35) |
| Emotional support (ending year) | Yes=1, no=0 | 0.13 (0.34) |
| Number of support (baseline) | 1–8 | 0.94 (1.5) |
| Number of support (ending year) | 1–8 | 0.86 (1.5) |
Notes: N=2,389 (observations=3,882). SD: standard deviation.
Ordered logistic regression
| Predictors | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | POR | Coefficient | POR | Coefficient | POR | |
| Parent's characteristics: | ||||||
| Age | −0.01 | 0.99* | −0.01 | 0.99 | −0.01 | 0.99 |
| Gender (=female) | −0.02 | 0.98 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Rural residency | −0.09 | 0.91 | −0.10 | 0.91 | −0.10 | 0.90 |
| High school education or higher | 0.25 | 1.28** | 0.24 | 1.27** | 0.24 | 1.27** |
| Household income | 0.01 | 1.01 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 0.01 | 1.01 |
| Filial attitudes | −0.04 | 0.96 | −0.04 | 0.96 | −0.07 | 0.93 |
| ADL difficulty (baseline) | −0.17 | 0.85 | −0.09 | 0.92 | −0.06 | 0.94 |
| ADL difficulty (ending year) | −0.93 | 0.40*** | −0.91 | 0.40*** | −0.90 | 0.40*** |
| PGC morale baseline score | 0.40 | 1.49*** | 0.40 | 1.49*** | 0.40 | 1.49*** |
| Data belong to the three-year interval (2003–06) | −0.38 | 0.69*** | −0.38 | 0.69*** | −0.38 | 0.69*** |
| Structural social support: | ||||||
| Widowhood (baseline) | −0.09 | 0.91 | −0.10 | 0.90 | ||
| Widowhood (ending year) | 0.02 | 1.02 | −0.46 | 0.63† | ||
| Number of children | 0.05 | 1.05 | 0.05 | 1.05 | ||
| Co-residence with a child (baseline) | −0.13 | 0.88 | −0.13 | 0.87 | ||
| Co-residence with a child (ending year) | 0.27 | 1.31† | 0.39 | 1.48 | ||
| Children living in the same city (baseline) | 0.01 | 1.01 | 0.02 | 1.02 | ||
| Children living in the same city (ending year) | −0.13 | 0.88 | −0.12 | 0.89 | ||
| Having at least one son | −0.13 | 0.88 | −0.11 | 0.90 | ||
| Functional social support: | ||||||
| Receiving support: | ||||||
| Financial support (baseline) | 0.16 | 1.17 | 0.16 | 1.18 | ||
| Financial support (ending year) | −0.04 | 0.97 | −0.35 | 0.70 | ||
| Instrumental support (baseline) | 0.21 | 1.24 | 0.23 | 1.25 | ||
| Instrumental support (ending year) | −0.01 | 0.99 | 0.29 | 1.33 | ||
| Emotional support (baseline) | 0.14 | 1.15 | 0.15 | 1.16 | ||
| Emotional support (ending year) | −0.19 | 0.83 | −0.83 | 0.44* | ||
| Number of support (baseline) | −0.13 | 0.87* | −0.15 | 0.86* | ||
| Number of support (ending year) | −0.02 | 0.97 | 0.06 | 1.06 | ||
| Providing support: | ||||||
| Financial support (baseline) | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.02 | 1.02 | ||
| Financial support (ending year) | −0.19 | 0.83 | 0.07 | 1.07 | ||
| Instrumental support (baseline) | 0.19 | 1.21 | 0.21 | 1.23 | ||
| Instrumental support (ending year) | −0.27 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 1.74 | ||
| Emotional support (baseline) | 0.24 | 1.27 | 0.24 | 1.27 | ||
| Emotional support (ending year) | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.55 | 1.74 | ||
| Number of support (baseline) | −0.06 | 0.94 | −0.07 | 0.94 | ||
| Number of support (ending year) | 0.06 | 1.06 | −0.11 | 0.90 | ||
| Statistically significant interaction term: | ||||||
| Filial attitudes×widowhood | 0.18 | 1.20* | ||||
| Filial attitudes×receiving emotional support | 0.22 | 1.25† | ||||
Notes: N=3,882. ADL: activity of daily living. PGC: Philadelphia Geriatric Center. POR: proportional odds ratio.
Significance levels: † p<0.1, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.