Literature DB >> 23913639

Dynamic prognostication using conditional survival estimates.

Emily C Zabor1, Mithat Gonen, Paul B Chapman, Katherine S Panageas.   

Abstract

Measures of prognosis are typically estimated from the time of diagnosis. However, these estimates become less relevant as the time from diagnosis increases for a patient. Conditional survival measures the probability that a cancer patient will survive some additional number of years, given that the patient has already survived for a certain number of years. In the current study, the authors analyzed data regarding patients with stage III melanoma to demonstrate that survival estimates from the time of diagnosis underestimate long-term survival as the patient is followed over time. The probability of surviving to year 5 for patients at the time of presentation compared with patients who had already survived for 4 years increased from 72% to 95%, 48% to 90%, and 29% to 86%, respectively, for patients with substage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC disease. Considering the major role played by survival estimates during follow-up in patient counseling and the development of survivorship programs, the authors strongly recommend the routine use of conditional survival estimates.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditional survival; melanoma; patient counseling; prognosis; survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913639     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  32 in total

Review 1.  Statistical Methods for Conditional Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; Ho Yun Lee; Shein-Chung Chow
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Changing Odds of Survival Over Time among Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection of Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Buettner; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Yuhree Kim; Faiz Gani; Cecilia G Ethun; George A Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Prognosis and conditional disease-free survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Michelle L Kurta; Robert P Edwards; Kirsten B Moysich; Kathleen McDonough; Marnie Bertolet; Joel L Weissfeld; Janet M Catov; Francesmary Modugno; Clareann H Bunker; Roberta B Ness; Brenda Diergaarde
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Are we ready to predict late effects? A systematic review of clinically useful prediction models.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Shrujal S Baxi; Nirupa Raghunathan; Erin E Onstad; Andrew N Freedman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Karyn A Goodman; Christoffer Johansen; Matthew J Matasar; Peter de Nully Brown; Kevin C Oeffinger; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The Optimal Timing of Stage 2 Palliation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Data Set.

Authors:  James M Meza; Edward J Hickey; Eugene H Blackstone; Robert D B Jaquiss; Brett R Anderson; William G Williams; Sally Cai; Glen S Van Arsdell; Tara Karamlou; Brian W McCrindle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90-day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Katherine Mallin; Mark A Weaver; Bryan Palis; Andrew Stewart; David P Winchester; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models.

Authors:  A Choudhury; A Jindal; R Maiwall; M K Sharma; B C Sharma; V Pamecha; M Mahtab; S Rahman; Y K Chawla; S Taneja; S S Tan; H Devarbhavi; Z Duan; Chen Yu; Q Ning; Ji Dong Jia; D Amarapurkar; C E Eapen; A Goel; S S Hamid; A S Butt; W Jafri; D J Kim; H Ghazinian; G H Lee; Ajit Sood; L A Lesmana; Z Abbas; G Shiha; D A Payawal; A K Dokmeci; J D Sollano; G Carpio; G K Lau; F Karim; P N Rao; R Moreau; P Jain; P Bhatia; G Kumar; S K Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.047

8.  Synchronous vs. Metachronous Metastases in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: an Analysis of the Dutch Adrenal Network.

Authors:  M H T Ettaieb; J C Duker; R A Feelders; E P M Corssmit; C W Menke-van der Houven van Oordt; H J L M Timmers; M N Kerstens; J W Wilmink; P M Zelissen; B Havekes; H R Haak
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.869

9.  Comment on "Age Conditional Probability of Ocular and Ocular Adnexal Malignancies".

Authors:  Emily C Zabor
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2020-12-30

10.  Incorporating conditional survival into prognostication for gunshot wounds to the head.

Authors:  Patrick D Kelly; Pious D Patel; Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Daniel I Wolfson; Fakhry Dawoud; Ranbir Ahluwalia; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Christopher M Bonfield
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.