Literature DB >> 23913506

Variation in the response of an Arctic top predator experiencing habitat loss: feeding and reproductive ecology of two polar bear populations.

Karyn D Rode1, Eric V Regehr, David C Douglas, George Durner, Andrew E Derocher, Gregory W Thiemann, Suzanne M Budge.   

Abstract

Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) have experienced substantial changes in the seasonal availability of sea ice habitat in parts of their range, including the Beaufort, Chukchi, and Bering Seas. In this study, we compared the body size, condition, and recruitment of polar bears captured in the Chukchi and Bering Seas (CS) between two periods (1986-1994 and 2008-2011) when declines in sea ice habitat occurred. In addition, we compared metrics for the CS population 2008-2011 with those of the adjacent southern Beaufort Sea (SB) population where loss in sea ice habitat has been associated with declines in body condition, size, recruitment, and survival. We evaluated how variation in body condition and recruitment were related to feeding ecology. Comparing habitat conditions between populations, there were twice as many reduced ice days over continental shelf waters per year during 2008-2011 in the SB than in the CS. CS polar bears were larger and in better condition, and appeared to have higher reproduction than SB bears. Although SB and CS bears had similar diets, twice as many bears were fasting in spring in the SB than in the CS. Between 1986-1994 and 2008-2011, body size, condition, and recruitment indices in the CS were not reduced despite a 44-day increase in the number of reduced ice days. Bears in the CS exhibited large body size, good body condition, and high indices of recruitment compared to most other populations measured to date. Higher biological productivity and prey availability in the CS relative to the SB, and a shorter recent history of reduced sea ice habitat, may explain the maintenance of condition and recruitment of CS bears. Geographic differences in the response of polar bears to climate change are relevant to range-wide forecasts for this and other ice-dependent species.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body condition; Ursus maritimus; body size; climate change; diet; feeding ecology; morphometrics; reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913506     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  28 in total

1.  Habitat degradation affects the summer activity of polar bears.

Authors:  Jasmine V Ware; Karyn D Rode; Jeffrey F Bromaghin; David C Douglas; Ryan R Wilson; Eric V Regehr; Steven C Amstrup; George M Durner; Anthony M Pagano; Jay Olson; Charles T Robbins; Heiko T Jansen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Invariant polar bear habitat selection during a period of sea ice loss.

Authors:  Ryan R Wilson; Eric V Regehr; Karyn D Rode; Michelle St Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Allee effect in polar bears: a potential consequence of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination.

Authors:  Viola Pavlova; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Rune Dietz; Christian Sonne; Volker Grimm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aerial survey estimates of polar bears and their tracks in the Chukchi Sea.

Authors:  Paul B Conn; Vladimir I Chernook; Erin E Moreland; Irina S Trukhanova; Eric V Regehr; Alexander N Vasiliev; Ryan R Wilson; Stanislav E Belikov; Peter L Boveng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Summer/fall diet and macronutrient assimilation in an Arctic predator.

Authors:  C A Stricker; K D Rode; B D Taras; J F Bromaghin; L Horstmann; L Quakenbush
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Intrapopulation differences in polar bear movement and step selection patterns.

Authors:  Ryan R Wilson; Michelle St Martin; Eric V Regehr; Karyn D Rode
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.253

7.  Demographic risk assessment for a harvested species threatened by climate change: polar bears in the Chukchi Sea.

Authors:  Eric V Regehr; Michael C Runge; Andrew Von Duyke; Ryan R Wilson; Lori Polasek; Karyn D Rode; Nathan J Hostetter; Sarah J Converse
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.105

8.  Distance measures and optimization spaces in quantitative fatty acid signature analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Bromaghin; Karyn D Rode; Suzanne M Budge; Gregory W Thiemann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Projected polar bear sea ice habitat in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

Authors:  Stephen G Hamilton; Laura Castro de la Guardia; Andrew E Derocher; Vicki Sahanatien; Bruno Tremblay; David Huard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implications of the circumpolar genetic structure of polar bears for their conservation in a rapidly warming Arctic.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peacock; Sarah A Sonsthagen; Martyn E Obbard; Andrei Boltunov; Eric V Regehr; Nikita Ovsyanikov; Jon Aars; Stephen N Atkinson; George K Sage; Andrew G Hope; Eve Zeyl; Lutz Bachmann; Dorothee Ehrich; Kim T Scribner; Steven C Amstrup; Stanislav Belikov; Erik W Born; Andrew E Derocher; Ian Stirling; Mitchell K Taylor; Øystein Wiig; David Paetkau; Sandra L Talbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.