Literature DB >> 23913127

Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation and its evolution: the Portuguese case.

Luis Mendonça1, Julian Perelman, Vanessa Rodrigues, José Fragata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the costs and outcomes of lung transplant in Portugal and its evolution since it was first performed in 2000.
METHODS: Data were collected for all patients waiting for transplant from 31 December 2000 until 31 December 2010 (n = 61). Patients waiting for transplant were used as the comparison group. We calculated the mean restricted survival time using the Kaplan-Meier estimation method. The time horizon was closed upon the death of the last surviving patient. Costs and consequences were discounted at 5% per annum. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of transplant as compared to no transplant. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. We tested volume-outcome effects using a parametric survival regression.
RESULTS: The cost of lung transplantation was 77,223€ per QALY and 121,276€ per life-year. Assuming a 50,000€/QALY willingness-to-pay, lung transplant would be cost-effective with a 37% probability. Survival improved substantially from 5.15 years over the 2001-2010 period to 6.94 years for the 2008-2010 period. When restricting our analysis to the 2008-2010 period, the cost-effectiveness ratio decreased to €79,016 per life-year gained and €69,241 per QALY. Survival was significantly associated with the number of procedures performed.
CONCLUSION: Although above commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, the economic value of lung transplant holds promise in Portugal due to the large improvement in survival over the 2001-2010 period. The life-threatening character of the motivating conditions, the absence of alternative treatment, and equity concerns should be also accounted for when assessing the "value for money" of lung transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913127     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0522-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of quality of life in lung transplantation using a simple generic tool.

Authors:  A C Anyanwu; A McGuire; C A Rogers; A J Murday
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.

Authors:  L Andronis; P Barton; S Bryan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 29th adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2012.

Authors:  Jason D Christie; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Anne I Dipchand; Fabienne Dobbels; Richard Kirk; Axel O Rahmel; Josef Stehlik; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  An economic evaluation of lung transplantation.

Authors:  Ani C Anyanwu; Alistair McGuire; Chris A Rogers; Andrew J Murday
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of lung transplantation.

Authors:  Helen-Maria Vasiliadis; Jean-Paul Collet; John R Penrod; Pasquale Ferraro; Charles Poirier
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Estimating survival gain for economic evaluations with survival time as principal endpoint: a cost-effectiveness analysis of adding early hormonal therapy to radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  N Neymark; I Adriaenssen; T Gorlia; S Caleo; M Bolla
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in relation to type of end-stage pulmonary disease.

Authors:  H Groen; W van der Bij; G H Koëter; E M TenVergert
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Indications, patient selection and timing of referral for lung transplantation.

Authors:  A R Glanville; M Estenne
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 16.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.