Literature DB >> 23912731

Justice in jeopardy: a qualitative study of institutional ethics committees in New Delhi.

Rohini Kandhari1.   

Abstract

Protecting the safety and welfare of clinical trial subjects is the primary responsibility of the multidisciplinary ethics committee. In India, ethics committees have come under increasing criticism for functioning as "secret societies unaccountable to the public" (1). Yet, little effort has been made to undertake qualitative research on the ethics review bodies. This article describes the essential findings of a study that aimed at providing an insight into the structure and functioning of institutional ethics committees (IECs) in selected hospitals in Delhi. Importantly, the study also attempted to investigate the challenges faced by IEC members that pose barriers to IEC performance and thus jeopardise a just and effective system of protection for the human trial subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912731     DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2013.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0974-8466


  2 in total

1.  What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Sangeetha Paramasivan; Philippa Davies; Alison Richards; Julia Wade; Leila Rooshenas; Nicola Mills; Alba Realpe; Jeffrey Pradeep Raj; Supriya Subramani; Jonathan Ives; Richard Huxtable; Jane M Blazeby; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

2.  An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of institutional ethics committee members from eastern India regarding ethics committee functioning and pharmacovigilance activities conducted during clinical trials: A pilot study.

Authors:  Subhrojyoti Bhowmick; Koyel Banerjee; Shreya Sikdar; Tapan Kumar Chatterjee
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2014-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.