Literature DB >> 23912533

Low-dose methotrexate treatment in ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 164 ectopic pregnancies treated between 2000 and 2008.

Johannes Lermann1, Petra Segl, Sebastian M Jud, Matthias W Beckmann, Peter Oppelt, Falk C Thiel, Stefan P Renner, Andreas Müller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ectopic pregnancy is an acute, potentially life-threatening condition. The aim of this study was to compare the results of surgery and methotrexate treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy, along with a review of the literature.
METHODS: 164 women with ectopic pregnancy, treated from 2000 to 2008 at the university gynecology department, were examined in a retrospective analysis. Patients with diagnosed ectopic pregnancy underwent one of the following treatments: Salpingotomy, salpingectomy or administration of a single dose of 30 mg methotrexate. The main outcome measures were treatment success rate, rate of patients wishing to have children after the ectopic pregnancy, and rates of pregnancy, live births, recurrent ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, use of assisted reproduction and side effects.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in success rates between the groups (methotrexate 83.9 %, salpingotomy 88.2 %, salpingectomy 96.8 %). Significantly more patients in the salpingotomy group wished to become pregnant afterward than in the salpingectomy group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the rates of intrauterine pregnancy, live births, recurrences, miscarriages, or side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: With defined inclusion criteria, similar results can be achieved with low-dose single administration of 30 mg methotrexate in comparison with surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy. On the basis of the data presented here, further research to establish optimal dosages for methotrexate is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912533     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2982-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolin Cheng; Xiaoyu Tian; Zhen Yan; Mengmeng Jia; Jie Deng; Ying Wang; Dongmei Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  World-wide research architecture of vitamin D research: density-equalizing mapping studies and socio-economic analysis.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; Annahita Alafi; Jenny Jaque; Doris Klingelhöfer; Michael H Bendels; Daniela Ohlendorf; David Quarcoo; Frank Louwen; Sue A Ingles; Eileen M Wanke; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Single-dose methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: Our experience from 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Emre Erdem Tas; Gulin Feykan Yegin Akcay; Ayse Filiz Avsar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Yi-An Tu; Yi-Ping Li; Chien-Nan Lee; Wen-Wei Hsu; Jin-Chung Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Model to Predict Treatment Failure of Single‑Dose Methotrexate in Patients with Tubal Pregnancy.

Authors:  Si Chen; Fangfang Zhu; Yingxuan Zhang; Jing Li; Jie Gao; Gaopi Deng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-08

6.  Fertility outcomes subsequent to medical and surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Asgari; Venus Chegini; Reihaneh Hosseini; Mina Mohajeri; Iman Ansari
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-11-04

7.  Ectopic pregnancy: exploration of its global research architecture using density-equalising mapping and socioeconomic benchmarks.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; Jana Kollascheck; David Quarcoo; Michael H Bendels; Doris Klingelhöfer; Frank Louwen; Jenny M Jaque; David A Groneberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.