Joseph Romagnuolo1, Peter B Cotton. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. romagnuo@musc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish benchmarks for fluoroscopy time (FT) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assess the effect of physician practice networking on time trends. METHODS: Data from the ERCP Quality Network were used to assess practice variability in FT and establish case- and provider-level benchmarks of the first 200 cases for providers entering more than 100 cases. Trends in FT and high FT, by 50-patient groupings, were assessed by multilevel multivariate linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median FT was 2.9 minutes, averaging 16% of procedure time. Ninetieth percentiles for the 57 eligible providers were 10 minutes and 22% (n = 9, 185 ERCP). Every 50 cases entered was associated with lower FT. In multivariate analysis, more cases entered, higher lifetime and annual volumes, lower difficulty grade, and manometry had lower FTs; academics, trainee involvement, various therapeutics, and failed cannulation had higher FTs. CONCLUSIONS: FT is highly variable, and many provider and case factors predict FT. FT benchmarks are now available. Self-review of one's case FT might decrease FT.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish benchmarks for fluoroscopy time (FT) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assess the effect of physician practice networking on time trends. METHODS: Data from the ERCP Quality Network were used to assess practice variability in FT and establish case- and provider-level benchmarks of the first 200 cases for providers entering more than 100 cases. Trends in FT and high FT, by 50-patient groupings, were assessed by multilevel multivariate linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Median FT was 2.9 minutes, averaging 16% of procedure time. Ninetieth percentiles for the 57 eligible providers were 10 minutes and 22% (n = 9, 185 ERCP). Every 50 cases entered was associated with lower FT. In multivariate analysis, more cases entered, higher lifetime and annual volumes, lower difficulty grade, and manometry had lower FTs; academics, trainee involvement, various therapeutics, and failed cannulation had higher FTs. CONCLUSIONS: FT is highly variable, and many provider and case factors predict FT. FT benchmarks are now available. Self-review of one's case FT might decrease FT.
Authors: Amer A Alkhatib; Ala A Abdel Jalil; Douglas O Faigel; Rahul Pannala; Michael Crowell; M E Harrison Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Harry R Aslanian; Loren Laine; James Farrell; Maria M Ciarleglio; Yanhong Deng; Henry Ho; Priya A Jamidar Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Toufic Kachaamy; Edwyn Harrison; Rahul Pannala; William Pavlicek; Michael D Crowell; Douglas O Faigel Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 5.742