Literature DB >> 23911847

Who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of quitline support? Comparison of participants versus nonparticipants.

Flora Tzelepis1, Christine L Paul, Raoul A Walsh, Jenny Knight, John Wiggers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the characteristics of smokers who enroll in a trial of quitline support and those who decline could guide recruitment approaches and service delivery to better engage smokers and increase successful quitting. However, it is unknown whether factors such as smokers' perceived effectiveness of using quitting aids or self-exempting beliefs are associated with quitline uptake. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics, smoking behaviours, perceived effectiveness of using quitting aids, and self-exempting beliefs of participants and nonparticipants who were actively telephoned and offered quitline support as part of a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Overall, 48,014 telephone numbers were randomly selected from the electronic telephone directory and contacted. A total of 3,008 eligible smokers were identified and invited to participate in a trial of quitline support. Consenting trial participants (n = 1,562) and nonparticipants (n = 500) completed a baseline interview.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that the following factors were associated with trial participation: consumption of 21 or more cigarettes per day (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45 [1.07-1.99]), readiness to quit within 30 days (OR = 4.45 [3.20-6.19]) or 6 months (OR = 3.22 [2.46-4.23]), perceiving that calling the quitline was definitely (OR = 2.34 [1.62-3.39]) or partly effective (OR = 2.15 [1.63-2.83]), believing that using self-help materials was partly effective (OR = 1.50 [1.16-1.94]), thinking that nicotine replacement therapy was partly effective (OR = 1.38 [1.04-1.84]), perceiving that using willpower alone was partly (OR = 1.99 [1.48-2.67]) or not effective (OR = 2.60 [1.95-3.46]), and not holding a self-exempting belief (OR = 1.45 [1.11-1.89]).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing smokers' utilization of quitlines is likely to require changing their perceptions of the effectiveness of quitting strategies compared with using willpower alone and addressing self-exempting beliefs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911847     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntt114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  4 in total

1.  Perceived role of motivation and self-efficacy in smoking cessation: A secondary data analysis.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Shelly Naud
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.

Authors:  William Matkin; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-02

3.  'Very brief advice' (VBA) on smoking in family practice: a qualitative evaluation of the tobacco user's perspective.

Authors:  Sophia Papadakis; Marilena Anastasaki; Maria Papadakaki; Μaria Antonopoulou; Constantine Chliveros; Chrissi Daskalaki; Dionisis Varthalis; Sofia Triantafyllou; Irene Vasilaki; Andy McEwen; Christos Lionis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Predictors of Enrollment of Older Smokers in Six Smoking Cessation Trials in the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: The Smoking Cessation at Lung Examination (SCALE) Collaboration.

Authors:  Ellie Eyestone; Randi M Williams; George Luta; Emily Kim; Benjamin A Toll; Alana Rojewski; Jordan Neil; Paul M Cinciripini; Marisa Cordon; Kristie Foley; Jennifer S Haas; Anne M Joseph; Jennifer A Minnix; Jamie S Ostroff; Elyse Park; Nancy Rigotti; Lia Sorgen; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.