Literature DB >> 23911569

Baseline and genotoxic compound induced gene expression profiles in HepG2 and HepaRG compared to primary human hepatocytes.

M J A Jetten1, J C S Kleinjans, S M Claessen, C Chesné, J H M van Delft.   

Abstract

Efforts are put into developing toxicogenomics-based toxicity testing methods using in vitro human cell models for improving human risk assessment/replacing animal models. Human in vitro liver models include HepG2, HepaRG and primary human hepatocytes (PHH). Studies on comparability/applicability of these cell types mainly focus on assessing baseline biotransformation capacities/cytochrome P450-inducibility, but compound-induced gene expression profiles are at least as important. Therefore, we compared baseline and aflatoxin B1- and benzo(α)pyrene-induced gene expression profiles in HepG2, HepaRG and PHH (11-13 donors). At baseline, all liver models differ from each other with respect to whole genome gene expression levels. PHH show profound inter-individual differences, and are most similar to HepaRG. After compound exposure, induced gene expression profiles are more similar between cell models, especially for benzo(α)pyrene. Pathways involved in compound metabolism are induced in all 3 models, while others are more pronounced in a specific cell model. Examples are transcriptomic modifications of carbohydrate-related genes (HepaRG) and of receptor-related genes (PHH) after benzo(α)pyrene exposure, and of cell cycle-related genes (HepG2) after aflatoxin B1 exposure. PHH gene expression responses are the most heterogeneous. In conclusion, at base line level PHH are more similar to HepaRG than to HepG2, but for toxicogenomics applications both cell lines perform equally well in comparison to PHH.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene expression; HepG2; HepaRG; Interindividual variability; Primary human hepatocytes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911569     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

1.  Model-based translation of DNA damage signaling dynamics across cell types.

Authors:  Muriel M Heldring; Lukas S Wijaya; Marije Niemeijer; Huan Yang; Talel Lakhal; Sylvia E Le Dévédec; Bob van de Water; Joost B Beltman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  Comparative Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Salix Cortex Extracts and Acetylsalicylic Acid in SARS-CoV-2 Peptide and LPS-Activated Human In Vitro Systems.

Authors:  Nguyen Phan Khoi Le; Corinna Herz; João Victor Dutra Gomes; Nadja Förster; Kyriaki Antoniadou; Verena Karolin Mittermeier-Kleßinger; Inga Mewis; Corinna Dawid; Christian Ulrichs; Evelyn Lamy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Footprint-free human fetal foreskin derived iPSCs: A tool for modeling hepatogenesis associated gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Peggy Matz; Wasco Wruck; Beatrix Fauler; Diran Herebian; Thorsten Mielke; James Adjaye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Human pluripotent stem cell derived HLC transcriptome data enables molecular dissection of hepatogenesis.

Authors:  Wasco Wruck; James Adjaye
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Protective effects of an ethanol extract of Angelica keiskei against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in HepG2 and HepaRG cells.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Choi; Hyun Sook Lee; Cha-Kwon Chung; Eun Ji Kim; Il-Jun Kang
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Insights into Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity in Cattle: An In Vitro Whole-Transcriptomic Approach.

Authors:  Marianna Pauletto; Roberta Tolosi; Mery Giantin; Giorgia Guerra; Andrea Barbarossa; Anna Zaghini; Mauro Dacasto
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  An ensemble learning approach for modeling the systems biology of drug-induced injury.

Authors:  Joaquim Aguirre-Plans; Janet Piñero; Terezinha Souza; Giulia Callegaro; Steven J Kunnen; Ferran Sanz; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Laura I Furlong; Emre Guney; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Comparative Analysis of Transcriptional Responses to Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Agents in the Blood Cell Model TK6 and the Liver Model HepaRG.

Authors:  Katrin Kreuzer; Heike Sprenger; Albert Braeuning
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  New insights into BaP-induced toxicity: role of major metabolites in transcriptomics and contribution to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  Terezinha Souza; Danyel Jennen; Joost van Delft; Marcel van Herwijnen; Soterios Kyrtoupolos; Jos Kleinjans
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Rémi Gagné; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Stephen S Ferguson; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2020-02-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.