Literature DB >> 23911172

Higher accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in insulin-treated patients in Germany: clinical and economical aspects.

Oliver Schnell1, Michael Erbach, Eva Wintergerst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accuracy standards of blood glucose (BG) meters are currently under review. Revised standards are expected to tighten accuracy requirements. Regarding clinical and financial impact of BG meter accuracy, very little data are available. The aim of this study was to analyze potential cost savings related to higher accuracy of glucose meters in Germany.
METHODS: As a model for calculation, a reduction of meter error from 20% to 5% was applied. The health economic analysis was based on four main pillars: (1) number of insulin-treated patients; (2) costs for glucose monitoring in Germany; (3) data of a modeling analysis on the impact on hypoglycemic episodes, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and, subsequently, myocardial infarctions; and (4) costs of diabetes-related complications in Germany. A reduction of meter error from 20% to 5% was identified to be associated with a 10% reduction in severe hypoglycemic episodes and a 0.39% reduction in HbA1c, which translates into a 0.5% reduction of myocardial infarctions.
RESULTS: According to the health economic analysis, the reduction in severe hypoglycemic episodes and myocardial infarctions led to cost savings of €24.14 per patient per year. Considering 390,000 type 1 diabetes patients or 2.3 million insulin-treated patients in Germany, these savings could be equal to a reduction in health care expenditures of more than €9.4 million and €55.5 million, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Potential cost savings and clinical effects due to higher accuracy of BG meters should provide an impetus to implementation of tighter accuracy standards and development of glucose meters that provide highest possible accuracy.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23911172      PMCID: PMC3879755          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  47 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose in the management of new-onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: the St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic-based interventional study with parallel groups.

Authors:  Alejandra Durán; Patricia Martín; Isabelle Runkle; Natalia Pérez; Rosario Abad; Mercedes Fernández; Laura Del Valle; Maria Fuencisla Sanz; Alfonso Luis Calle-Pascual
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.006

Review 3.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura M C Welschen; Evelien Bloemendal; Giel Nijpels; Jacqueline M Dekker; Robert J Heine; Wim A B Stalman; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Non-coding glucometers among pediatric patients with diabetes: looking for the target population and an accuracy evaluation of no-coding personal glucometer.

Authors:  Wojciech Fendler; Anna Hogendorf; Agnieszka Szadkowska; Wojciech Młynarski
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2011

5.  Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Erik Otto; Daniel Cox; Linda Gonder-Frederick; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Evaluation of the analytical performance of the coulometry-based Optium Omega blood glucose meter.

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Beata Kusnierz-Cabala; Krystyna Slowinska-Solnica; Przemyslaw Witek; Agnieszka Cempa; Maciej T Malecki
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

8.  Performance of the CONTOUR® TS Blood Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Joy Frank; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 9.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin.

Authors:  Uriëll L Malanda; Laura M C Welschen; Ingrid I Riphagen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Sandra D M Bot
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

10.  [Structured treatment and teaching programs and an improvement in private health care lead to a better quality of diabetes care. JEVIN, a population-based trial 1989/90 up to 1999/2000].

Authors:  Ralf Schiel; Ulrich A Müller
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2003-06-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Economic Value of Improved Accuracy for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Devices for Type 1 Diabetes in Canada.

Authors:  R Brett McQueen; Marc D Breton; Markus Ott; Helena Koa; Bruce Beamer; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 2.  Toward a Framework for Outcome-Based Analytical Performance Specifications: A Methodology Review of Indirect Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Measurement Uncertainty on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Alison F Smith; Bethany Shinkins; Peter S Hall; Claire T Hulme; Mike P Messenger
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Improvement of Metabolic Control and Diabetes Management in Insulin-Treated Patients Results in Substantial Cost Savings for the German Health System.

Authors:  Katharina Fritzen; Bettina Gutschek; Benedikte Coucke; Katerina Zakrzewska; Michael Hummel; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Economic Value of Improved Accuracy for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Devices for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in England.

Authors:  Robert Brett McQueen; Marc D Breton; Joyce Craig; Hayden Holmes; Melanie D Whittington; Markus A Ott; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-21

5.  Pan-European Economic Analysis to Identify Cost Savings for the Health Care Systems as a Result of Integrating Glucose Monitoring Based Telemedical Approaches Into Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Katharina Fritzen; Kornelia Basinska; Matilde Rubio-Almanza; Antonio Nicolucci; Brian Kennon; Bruno Vergès; Katerina Zakrzewska; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  Impact of a reduced error range of SMBG in insulin-treated patients in Germany.

Authors:  Oliver Schnell; Michael Erbach
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-05

7.  Budget Impact of Improved Diabetes Management by Utilization of Glucose Meters With a Color-Range Indicator-Comparison of Five European Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Katharina Fritzen; Kornelia Basinska; Constantin Stautner; Karl F Braun; Matilde Rubio-Almanza; Antonio Nicolucci; Brian Kennon; Bruno Vergès; Yasser Hosny; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.