Literature DB >> 23910952

Efficacy, usability and sequence of operations of a workflow-integrated algorithm for basal-bolus insulin therapy in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients.

J K Mader1, K M Neubauer, L Schaupp, T Augustin, P Beck, S Spat, B Höll, G M Treiber, F M Fruhwald, T R Pieber, J Plank.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate glycaemic control and usability of a workflow-integrated algorithm for basal-bolus insulin therapy in a proof-of-concept study to develop a decision support system in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: In this ward-controlled study, 74 type 2 diabetes patients (24 female, age 68 ± 11 years, HbA1c 8.7 ± 2.4% and body mass index 30 ± 7) were assigned to either algorithm-based treatment with a basal-bolus insulin therapy or to standard glycaemic management. Algorithm performance was assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and staff's adherence to algorithm-calculated insulin dose.
RESULTS: Average blood glucose levels (mmol/l) in the algorithm group were significantly reduced from 11.3 ± 3.6 (baseline) to 8.2 ± 1.8 (last 24 h) over a period of 7.5 ± 4.6 days (p < 0.001). The algorithm group had a significantly higher percentage of glucose levels in the ranges from 5.6 to 7.8 mmol/l (target range) and 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/l compared with the standard group (33 vs. 23% and 73 vs. 53%, both p < 0.001). Physicians' adherence to the algorithm-calculated total daily insulin dose was 95% and nurses' adherence to inject the algorithm-calculated basal and bolus insulin doses was high (98 and 93%, respectively). In the algorithm group, significantly more glucose values <3.9 mmol/l were detected in the afternoon relative to other times (p < 0.05), a finding mainly related to pronounced morning glucose excursions and requirements for corrective bolus insulin at lunch.
CONCLUSIONS: The workflow-integrated algorithm for basal-bolus therapy was effective in establishing glycaemic control and was well accepted by medical staff. Our findings support the implementation of the algorithm in an electronic decision support system.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glycaemic control; insulin analogues; insulin therapy; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23910952     DOI: 10.1111/dom.12186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of "Comparison an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting".

Authors:  Silvia Leitgeb; Julia K Mader
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 2.  Diabetes Technology in the Inpatient Setting for Management of Hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Georgia M Davis; Rodolfo J Galindo; Alexandra L Migdal; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  A toolbox to improve algorithms for insulin-dosing decision support.

Authors:  K Donsa; P Beck; J Plank; L Schaupp; J K Mader; T Truskaller; B Tschapeller; B Höll; S Spat; T R Pieber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  A Mobile Computerized Decision Support System to Prevent Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Stephan Spat; Klaus Donsa; Peter Beck; Bernhard Höll; Julia K Mader; Lukas Schaupp; Thomas Augustin; Franco Chiarugi; Katharina M Lichtenegger; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-03

5.  Safe and Sufficient Glycemic Control by Using a Digital Clinical Decision Support System for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Routine Setting on General Hospital Wards.

Authors:  Katharina M Lichtenegger; Felix Aberer; Alexandru C Tuca; Klaus Donsa; Bernhard Höll; Lukas Schaupp; Johannes Plank; Peter Beck; Friedrich M Fruhwald; Lars-Peter Kamolz; Thomas R Pieber; Julia K Mader
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-11

Review 6.  Medical software applications for in-hospital insulin therapy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Mandaro Lavinas Jones; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Malena Costa Hita; Elisabeth Martinez Fonseca; Rodrigo Braga Pato; Marcos Tadashi Kakitani Toyoshima
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-12-26

7.  Standardized Glycemic Management with a Computerized Workflow and Decision Support System for Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Different Wards.

Authors:  Katharina M Neubauer; Julia K Mader; Bernhard Höll; Felix Aberer; Klaus Donsa; Thomas Augustin; Lukas Schaupp; Stephan Spat; Peter Beck; Friedrich M Fruhwald; Christian Schnedl; Alexander R Rosenkranz; David B Lumenta; Lars-Peter Kamolz; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  GlucoTab-guided insulin therapy using insulin glargine U300 enables glycaemic control with low risk of hypoglycaemia in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Felix Aberer; Katharina M Lichtenegger; Edin Smajic; Klaus Donsa; Oliver Malle; Judith Samonigg; Bernhard Höll; Peter Beck; Thomas R Pieber; Johannes Plank; Julia K Mader
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Biosensing Membrane Base on Ferulic Acid and Glucose Oxidase for an Amperometric Glucose Biosensor.

Authors:  Gabriela Valdés-Ramírez; Laura Galicia
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Sliding scale insulin for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Colunga-Lozano; Franscisco Javier Gonzalez Torres; Netzahualpilli Delgado-Figueroa; Daniel A Gonzalez-Padilla; Adrian V Hernandez; Yuani Roman; Carlos A Cuello-García
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.