| Literature DB >> 23910763 |
Kristof Vansteelandt1, Michel Probst, Guido Pieters.
Abstract
Differences in affective variability in eating disorders are examined using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol. It is hypothesized that restriction serves to pre-empt the activation of affect whereas bulimic behavior serves to cope with overwhelming affect once activated. Therefore, we expect anorexia nervosa (AN) patients of the restricting type (AN-RT) to have lower mean levels of affect and less affective variability than Bulimia Nervosa (BN) patients. Patients' successive affective states over time are represented as different positions in a two-dimensional space defined by the orthogonal dimensions of valence and activation. Affective variability is measured by the within person variance and the new concepts of pulse and spin. Results of this exploratory study suggest that the diagnostic groups have the same mean levels of affect but affect spins less in patients with AN-RT. Using an EMA protocol and measures like pulse and spin may reveal insights in eating disorders that remain hidden with more traditional assessment methods.Entities:
Keywords: Affective variability; Eating disorders; Ecological momentary assessment (EMA); Pulse; Spin
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23910763 DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.03.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eat Behav ISSN: 1471-0153