Literature DB >> 23910571

Compulsive cell phone use and history of motor vehicle crash.

Stephen S O'Connor1, Jennifer M Whitehill, Kevin M King, Mary A Kernic, Linda Ng Boyle, Brian W Bresnahan, Christopher D Mack, Beth E Ebel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies have examined the psychological factors underlying the association between cell phone use and motor vehicle crash. We sought to examine the factor structure and convergent validity of a measure of problematic cell phone use, and to explore whether compulsive cell phone use is associated with a history of motor vehicle crash.
METHODS: We recruited a sample of 383 undergraduate college students to complete an online assessment that included cell phone use and driving history. We explored the dimensionality of the Cell Phone Overuse Scale (CPOS) using factor analytic methods. Ordinary least-squares regression models were used to examine associations between identified subscales and measures of impulsivity, alcohol use, and anxious relationship style, to establish convergent validity. We used negative binomial regression models to investigate associations between the CPOS and motor vehicle crash incidence.
RESULTS: We found the CPOS to be composed of four subscales: anticipation, activity interfering, emotional reaction, and problem recognition. Each displayed significant associations with aspects of impulsivity, problematic alcohol use, and anxious relationship style characteristics. Only the anticipation subscale demonstrated statistically significant associations with reported motor vehicle crash incidence, controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics (relative ratio, 1.13; confidence interval, 1.01-1.26). For each 1-point increase on the 6-point anticipation subscale, risk for previous motor vehicle crash increased by 13%.
CONCLUSIONS: Crash risk is strongly associated with heightened anticipation about incoming phone calls or messages. The mean score on the CPOS is associated with increased risk of motor vehicle crash but does not reach statistical significance.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent behavior; Motor vehicle crashes; Technology; Traffic/prevention and control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23910571      PMCID: PMC3786686          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  18 in total

1.  Teenage drivers: patterns of risk.

Authors:  Allan F Williams
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2003-01

2.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Jim P Stimpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use.

Authors:  Adriana Bianchi; James G Phillips
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2005-02

4.  Understanding adolescent development: implications for driving safety.

Authors:  Daniel P Keating
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2007-03-28

Review 5.  Effects of age and experience on young driver crashes: review of recent literature.

Authors:  Anne T McCartt; Daniel R Mayhew; Keli A Braitman; Susan A Ferguson; Herbert M Simpson
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.491

6.  The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving.

Authors:  Erik Nelson; Paul Atchley; Todd D Little
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-02-12

Review 7.  Teen driving: motor-vehicle crashes and factors that contribute.

Authors:  Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  National young-driver survey: teen perspective and experience with factors that affect driving safety.

Authors:  Kenneth R Ginsburg; Flaura K Winston; Teresa M Senserrick; Felipe García-España; Sara Kinsman; D Alex Quistberg; James G Ross; Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

Authors:  J B Saunders; O G Aasland; T F Babor; J R de la Fuente; M Grant
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  The alcohol use disorders identification test for detecting at-risk drinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael M Berner; Levente Kriston; Michael Bentele; Martin Härter
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.582

View more
  7 in total

1.  "I wasn't texting; I was just reading an email …": a qualitative study of distracted driving enforcement in Washington State.

Authors:  Paul E Nevin; Laura Blanar; Annie Phare Kirk; Amy Freedheim; Robert Kaufman; Laura Hitchcock; Jennifer D Maeser; Beth E Ebel
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  "Technoference" and Implications for Mothers' and Fathers' Couple and Coparenting Relationship Quality.

Authors:  Brandon T McDaniel; Adam M Galovan; Jaclyn D Cravens; Michelle Drouin
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2017-11-14

3.  Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: the mediating role of mobile phone use patterns.

Authors:  Zhaocai Jiang; Xiuxin Zhao
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany Harris; Timothy Regan; Jordan Schueler; Sherecce A Fields
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-05

5.  Accident risk associated with smartphone addiction: A study on university students in Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Jin Kim; Jin-Young Min; Hyun-Jin Kim; Kyoung-Bok Min
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 6.  Beyond obesity and lifestyle: a review of 21st century chronic disease determinants.

Authors:  Garry Egger; John Dixon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Interactions of problematic mobile phone use and psychopathological symptoms with unintentional injuries: a school-based sample of Chinese adolescents.

Authors:  Shuman Tao; Xiaoyan Wu; Yuhui Wan; Shichen Zhang; Jiahu Hao; Fangbiao Tao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.