Literature DB >> 23910001

Pullout strength of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft bone plugs: a comparison of cadaver tibia and rigid polyurethane foam.

F Alan Barber1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the load-to-failure pullout strength of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allografts in human cadaver tibias and rigid polyurethane foam blocks.
METHODS: Twenty BPTB allografts were trimmed creating 25 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm tibial plugs. Ten-millimeter tunnels were drilled in 10 human cadaver tibias and 10 rigid polyurethane foam blocks. The BPTB anterior cruciate ligament allografts were inserted into these tunnels and secured with metal interference screws, with placement of 10 of each type in each material. After preloading (10 N), cyclic loading (500 cycles, 10 to 150 N at 200 mm/min) and load-to-failure testing (200 mm/min) were performed. The endpoints were ultimate failure load, cyclic loading elongation, and failure mode.
RESULTS: No difference in ultimate failure load existed between grafts inserted into rigid polyurethane foam blocks (705 N) and those in cadaver tibias (669 N) (P = .69). The mean rigid polyurethane foam block elongation (0.211 mm) was less than that in tibial bone (0.470 mm) (P = .038), with a smaller standard deviation (0.07 mm for foam) than tibial bone (0.34 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: All BPTB grafts successfully completed 500 cycles. The rigid polyurethane foam block showed less variation in test results than human cadaver tibias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rigid polyurethane foam blocks provide an acceptable substitute for human cadaver bone tibia for biomechanical testing of BPTB allografts and offer near-equivalent results.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23910001     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  3 in total

1.  Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis of simulated early motion and partial and full weightbearing on common reconstruction grafts.

Authors:  William R Mook; David Civitarese; Travis Lee Turnbull; Nicholas I Kennedy; Luke O'Brien; Jarod B Schoeberl; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of mechanical properties in interference screw fixation technique and organic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction method: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Amirhossein Borjali; Amir Nourani; Hadi Moeinnia; Mahdi Mohseni; Hossein Korani; Narges Ghias; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Redesigning Metal Interference Screws Can Improve Ease of Insertion While Maintaining Fixation of Soft-Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Grafts.

Authors:  Kiron K Athwal; Breck R Lord; Piers E Milner; Alex Gutteridge; Andy Williams; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.