| Literature DB >> 23909468 |
Su W Maung1, Maeve Leahy, Hilary M O'Leary, Irfan Khan, Mary R Cahill, Oonagh Gilligan, Philip Murphy, Suzanne McPherson, Fred Jackson, Mary Ryan, Brian Hennessy, Johnny McHugh, Matthew Goodyer, Larry Bacon, Peter O'Gorman, Aisling Nee, Michael O'Dwyer, Helen Enright, Jean Saunders, Denis O'Keeffe.
Abstract
This retrospective analysis assessed the response, safety and duration of response to standard dose rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly for four weeks as therapy for patients with primary or secondary warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (WAIHA), who had failed initial treatment. Thirty-four patients received rituximab for WAIHA in seven centres in the Republic of Ireland. The overall response rate was 70·6% (24/34) with 26·5% (9/34) achieving a complete response (CR). The time to response was 1 month post-initiation of rituximab in 87·5% (21/24) and 3 months in 12·5% (3/24) of patients. The median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 6-90 months). Of the patients who responded, 50% (12/24) relapsed during follow up with a median time to next treatment of 16·5 months (range 6-60 months). Three patients were re-treated with rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for four weeks at relapse and responded. There was a single episode of neutropenic sepsis. Rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for WAIHA but a significant number of patients will relapse in the first two years post treatment. Re-treatment was effective in a small number of patients, suggesting that intermittent pulse treatment or maintenance treatment may improve long-term response.Entities:
Keywords: autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; multicentre; retrospective; rituximab; safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23909468 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998