Literature DB >> 2390911

Chronic pilonidal disease. An assessment of 150 cases.

J A Solla1, D A Rothenberger.   

Abstract

During a four-year period, 150 consecutive patients were treated for chronic pilonidal disease by one of three different operative techniques. Patients with acute pilonidal abscesses or with complex or multiple recurrent pilonidal disease were excluded from this study. The average healing time was four weeks and the average length of hospital stay was one day. The overall recurrence rate was 8 percent (12 of 150 patients). The method of management most commonly used was fistulotomy with marsupialization of the sinus tract or cyst wall (125 of 150 patients). This simple and effective technique gave excellent results with a 6 percent recurrence rate (7 of 125 patients). On the basis of their experience, the authors propose that chronic pilonidal disease usually can be treated successfully on a same day surgery basis with fistulotomy, minimal excision, and marsupialization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2390911     DOI: 10.1007/bf02052321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  32 in total

1.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Amit Khanna; John L Rombeau
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

2.  Recurrent pilonidal sinus: lay open or flap closure, does it differ?

Authors:  Tayfun Yoldas; Can Karaca; Omer Unalp; Alper Uguz; Cemil Caliskan; Erhan Akgun; Mustafa Korkut
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

3.  Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Resit Inceoglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Karydakis flap for recurrent pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Igors Iesalnieks; Sina Deimel; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Are Naval Mines Relevant?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Comparison of the classic Limberg flap and modified Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective analysis of 416 patients.

Authors:  Murat Akin; Sezai Leventoglu; B Bulent Mentes; Hasan Bostanci; Hakan Gokbayir; Kadir Kilic; Ersin Ozdemir; Zafer Ferahkose
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  The simple sacral dimple: diagnostic yield of ultrasound in neonates.

Authors:  Jennifer N Kucera; Ian Coley; Sara O'Hara; Edward J Kosnik; Brian D Coley
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-07-05

8.  Volume of the excised specimen and prediction of surgical site infection in pilonidal sinus procedures (surgical site infection after pilonidal sinus surgery).

Authors:  Husnu Alptekin; Huseyin Yilmaz; Seyit Ali Kayis; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Franklin P Bendewald; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

10.  A scoring system as a method to evaluate pilonidal sinus disease to make an easy decision for its management.

Authors:  Mohamed Ms Awad; Amr Abd Elbaset; Samir Ebraheem; Esmael Tantawy; M Abd Elhafez; Atia M Elsayed
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.