Literature DB >> 23908016

Research ethics in the post-genomic era.

Kirsi Vähäkangas1.   

Abstract

New high-throughput 'omics techniques are providing exciting opportunities in clinical medicine and toxicology, especially in the development of biomarkers. In health science research there are traditional ethical considerations that are reasonably obvious, like balancing health benefits and health risks, autonomy mainly pursued by informed consent, and protecting privacy. Epidemiological studies applying new large-scale approaches (e.g., high-throughput or high-content methods and global studies that utilize biobanking of samples and produce large-scale datasets) present new challenges that call for re-evaluation of standard ethical considerations. In this context, assessment of the ethics underlying study designs, bioinformatics, and statistics applied in the generation and clinical translation of research results should also be considered. Indeed, there are ethical considerations in the research process itself, in research objectives and how research is pursued (e.g., which methodologies are selected and how they are carried out). Maintaining research integrity is critical, as demonstrated by the relatively frequent retraction of scientific papers following violations of good scientific practice. Abiding by the laws is necessary but not sufficient for good research ethics, which is and remains in the hands of the scientific community at the level of both individual scientists and organizations. Senior scientists are responsible for the transfer of research tradition to the next generation of scientists through education, mentorship, and setting an example by their own behavior, as well as by creating systems in institutions that support good research ethics.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  autonomy; genomic studies; privacy; research integrity; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23908016     DOI: 10.1002/em.21804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  5 in total

1.  Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring.

Authors:  Barry Bozeman; Jan Youtie
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Elements for adequate informed consent in the surgical context.

Authors:  Hernando Abaunza; Klaus Romero
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Individualized medicine enabled by genomics in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Mourad Assidi; Hans-Juergen Schulten; Ashraf Dallol; Peter Pushparaj; Farid Ahmed; Stephen W Scherer; Mohammed Al-Qahtani
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 4.  Biomarker discovery studies for patient stratification using machine learning analysis of omics data: a scoping review.

Authors:  Enrico Glaab; Armin Rauschenberger; Rita Banzi; Chiara Gerardi; Paula Garcia; Jacques Demotes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The MATEX cohort - a Finnish population register birth cohort to study health effects of prenatal exposures.

Authors:  Isabell K Rumrich; Kirsi Vähäkangas; Matti Viluksela; Mika Gissler; Heljä-Marja Surcel; Hanna de Ruyter; Jukka Jokinen; Otto Hänninen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.