UNLABELLED: The phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled PILLAR trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two different simeprevir (SMV) doses administered once-daily (QD) with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-α-2a and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Patients were randomized to one of five treatments: SMV (75 or 150 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks or placebo, plus Peg-IFN and RBV. Patients in the SMV arms stopped all treatment at week 24 if response-guided therapy (RGT) criteria were met; patients not meeting RGT continued with Peg-IFN and RBV until week 48, as did patients in the placebo control group. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates measured 24 weeks after the planned end of treatment (SVR24) were 74.7%-86.1% in the SMV groups versus 64.9% in the control group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons [SMV versus placebo], except SMV 75 mg for 24 weeks). Rapid virologic response (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL undetectable at week 4) was achieved by 68.0%-75.6% of SMV-treated and 5.2% of placebo control patients. According to RGT criteria, 79.2%-86.1% of SMV-treated patients completed treatment by week 24; 85.2%-95.6% of these subsequently achieved SVR24. The adverse event profile was generally similar across the SMV and placebo control groups, with the exception of mild reversible hyperbilirubinemia, without serum aminotransferase abnormalities, associated with higher doses of SMV. CONCLUSION:SMV QD in combination with Peg-IFN and RBV significantly improves SVR rates, compared with Peg-IFN and RBV alone, and allows the majority of patients to shorten their therapy duration to 24 weeks.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: The phase IIb, double-blind, placebo-controlled PILLAR trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two different simeprevir (SMV) doses administered once-daily (QD) with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-α-2a and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Patients were randomized to one of five treatments: SMV (75 or 150 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks or placebo, plus Peg-IFN and RBV. Patients in the SMV arms stopped all treatment at week 24 if response-guided therapy (RGT) criteria were met; patients not meeting RGT continued with Peg-IFN and RBV until week 48, as did patients in the placebo control group. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates measured 24 weeks after the planned end of treatment (SVR24) were 74.7%-86.1% in the SMV groups versus 64.9% in the control group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons [SMV versus placebo], except SMV 75 mg for 24 weeks). Rapid virologic response (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL undetectable at week 4) was achieved by 68.0%-75.6% of SMV-treated and 5.2% of placebo control patients. According to RGT criteria, 79.2%-86.1% of SMV-treated patients completed treatment by week 24; 85.2%-95.6% of these subsequently achieved SVR24. The adverse event profile was generally similar across the SMV and placebo control groups, with the exception of mild reversible hyperbilirubinemia, without serum aminotransferase abnormalities, associated with higher doses of SMV. CONCLUSION:SMV QD in combination with Peg-IFN and RBV significantly improves SVR rates, compared with Peg-IFN and RBV alone, and allows the majority of patients to shorten their therapy duration to 24 weeks.
Authors: Alexander J Thompson; Andrew J Muir; Mark S Sulkowski; Dongliang Ge; Jacques Fellay; Kevin V Shianna; Thomas Urban; Nezam H Afdhal; Ira M Jacobson; Rafael Esteban; Fred Poordad; Eric J Lawitz; Jonathan McCone; Mitchell L Shiffman; Greg W Galler; William M Lee; Robert Reindollar; John W King; Paul Y Kwo; Reem H Ghalib; Bradley Freilich; Lisa M Nyberg; Stefan Zeuzem; Thierry Poynard; David M Vock; Karen S Pieper; Keyur Patel; Hans L Tillmann; Stephanie Noviello; Kenneth Koury; Lisa D Pedicone; Clifford A Brass; Janice K Albrecht; David B Goldstein; John G McHutchison Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Henk W Reesink; Gregory C Fanning; Khalid Abou Farha; Christine Weegink; André Van Vliet; Gerben Van 't Klooster; Oliver Lenz; Fatima Aharchi; Kris Mariën; Pieter Van Remoortere; Herman de Kock; Fabrice Broeckaert; Paul Meyvisch; Els Van Beirendonck; Kenneth Simmen; René Verloes Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Vijayaprakash Suppiah; Max Moldovan; Golo Ahlenstiel; Thomas Berg; Martin Weltman; Maria Lorena Abate; Margaret Bassendine; Ulrich Spengler; Gregory J Dore; Elizabeth Powell; Stephen Riordan; David Sheridan; Antonina Smedile; Vincenzo Fragomeli; Tobias Müller; Melanie Bahlo; Graeme J Stewart; David R Booth; Jacob George Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-09-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Anu Osinusi; Anita Kohli; Miriam M Marti; Amy Nelson; Xiaozhen Zhang; Eric G Meissner; Rachel Silk; Kerry Townsend; Phillip S Pang; G Mani Subramanian; John G McHutchison; Anthony S Fauci; Henry Masur; Shyam Kottilil Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: F Wiesmann; G Naeth; C Sarrazin; A Berger; R Kaiser; R Ehret; H Knechten; P Braun Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: David Goldberg; Ivo C Ditah; Kia Saeian; Mona Lalehzari; Andrew Aronsohn; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Michael Charlton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Cassandra B Jabara; Fengyu Hu; Katie R Mollan; Sara E Williford; Prema Menezes; Yan Yang; Joseph J Eron; Michael W Fried; Michael G Hudgens; Corbin D Jones; Ronald Swanstrom; Stanley M Lemon Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cristiane Valle Tovo; Angelo Alves de Mattos; Paulo Roberto Lerias de Almeida Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 5.742