Literature DB >> 23907551

Distributions of amino acids suggest that certain residue types more effectively determine protein secondary structure.

S Saraswathi1, J L Fernández-Martínez, A Koliński, R L Jernigan, A Kloczkowski.   

Abstract

Exponential growth in the number of available protein sequences is unmatched by the slower growth in the number of structures. As a result, the development of efficient and fast protein secondary structure prediction methods is essential for the broad comprehension of protein structures. Computational methods that can efficiently determine secondary structure can in turn facilitate protein tertiary structure prediction, since most methods rely initially on secondary structure predictions. Recently, we have developed a fast learning optimized prediction methodology (FLOPRED) for predicting protein secondary structure (Saraswathi et al. in JMM 18:4275, 2012). Data are generated by using knowledge-based potentials combined with structure information from the CATH database. A neural network-based extreme learning machine (ELM) and advanced particle swarm optimization (PSO) are used with this data to obtain better and faster convergence to more accurate secondary structure predicted results. A five-fold cross-validated testing accuracy of 83.8 % and a segment overlap (SOV) score of 78.3 % are obtained in this study. Secondary structure predictions and their accuracy are usually presented for three secondary structure elements: α-helix, β-strand and coil but rarely have the results been analyzed with respect to their constituent amino acids. In this paper, we use the results obtained with FLOPRED to provide detailed behaviors for different amino acid types in the secondary structure prediction. We investigate the influence of the composition, physico-chemical properties and position specific occurrence preferences of amino acids within secondary structure elements. In addition, we identify the correlation between these properties and prediction accuracy. The present detailed results suggest several important ways that secondary structure predictions can be improved in the future that might lead to improved protein design and engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907551      PMCID: PMC4163568          DOI: 10.1007/s00894-013-1911-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  40 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  J A Cuff; G J Barton
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

4.  A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  A Zemla; C Venclovas; K Fidelis; B Rost
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-02-01

5.  The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins.

Authors:  Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A new expertness index for assessment of secondary structure prediction engines.

Authors:  M Kazemian; B Moshiri; H Nikbakht; C Lucas
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  A Consensus Data Mining secondary structure prediction by combining GOR V and Fragment Database Mining.

Authors:  Taner Z Sen; Haitao Cheng; Andrzej Kloczkowski; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Improving protein secondary structure prediction using a simple k-mer model.

Authors:  Martin Madera; Ryan Calmus; Grant Thiltgen; Kevin Karplus; Julian Gough
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  2 in total

1.  The influence of flanking secondary structures on amino Acid content and typical lengths of 3/10 helices.

Authors:  Vladislav Victorovich Khrustalev; Eugene Victorovich Barkovsky; Tatyana Aleksandrovna Khrustaleva
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2014-10-13

2.  Hot spot prediction in protein-protein interactions by an ensemble system.

Authors:  Quanya Liu; Peng Chen; Bing Wang; Jun Zhang; Jinyan Li
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2018-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.