Literature DB >> 23907547

Unit asking: a method to boost donations and beyond.

Christopher K Hsee1, Jiao Zhang, Zoe Y Lu, Fei Xu.   

Abstract

The solicitation of charitable donations costs billions of dollars annually. Here, we introduce a virtually costless method for boosting charitable donations to a group of needy persons: merely asking donors to indicate a hypothetical amount for helping one of the needy persons before asking donors to decide how much to donate for all of the needy persons. We demonstrated, in both real fund-raisers and scenario-based research, that this simple unit-asking method greatly increases donations for the group of needy persons. Different from phenomena such as the foot-in-the-door and identifiable-victim effects, the unit-asking effect arises because donors are initially scope insensitive and subsequently scope consistent. The method applies to both traditional paper-based fund-raisers and increasingly popular Web-based fund-raisers and has implications for domains other than fund-raisers, such as auctions and budget proposals. Our research suggests that a subtle manipulation based on psychological science can generate a substantial effect in real life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; judgment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907547     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613482947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  4 in total

1.  Mental Imagery, Impact, and Affect: A Mediation Model for Charitable Giving.

Authors:  Stephan Dickert; Janet Kleber; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Perceived human and material costs of disasters as drivers of donations.

Authors:  Hanna Zagefka
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2021-02-22

3.  Being Sticker Rich: Numerical Context Influences Children's Sharing Behavior.

Authors:  Tasha Posid; Allyse Fazio; Sara Cordes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Compassion fade: affect and charity are greatest for a single child in need.

Authors:  Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; Marcus Mayorga; Ellen Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.