Adaani E Frost1, David B Badesch2, Dave P Miller3, Raymond L Benza4, Leslie A Meltzer5, Michael D McGoon6. 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. Electronic address: frost@bcm.tmc.edu. 2. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO. 3. ICON Late Phase & Outcomes Research, San Francisco, CA. 4. Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, South San Francisco, CA. 6. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Time to clinical worsening has been proposed as a primary end point in clinical trials of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, neither standardized nor validated definitions of clinical worsening across PAH trials exist. This study aims to evaluate a proposed definition of clinical worsening within a large prospective, observational registry of patients with PAH with respect to its value as a predictor of proximate (within 1 year) risk for subsequent major events (ie, death, transplantation, or atrial septostomy). METHODS: We assessed overall 2-year survival and survival free from major events to determine the relationship between clinical worsening and major events among adults with hemodynamically defined PAH (N = 3,001). Freedom from clinical worsening was defined as freedom from worsening functional class (FC), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), all-cause hospitalization, or the introduction of parenteral prostacyclin analog therapy. RESULTS: In the 2 years of follow-up, 583 patients died. Four hundred twenty-six died after a documented clinical worsening event, including FC worsening (n = 128), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6MWD (n = 118), all-cause hospitalization (n = 370), or introduction of a prostacyclin analog (n = 91). Patients who experienced clinical worsening had significantly poorer subsequent 1-year survival postworsening than patients who did not worsen (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical worsening was highly predictive of subsequent proximate mortality in this analysis from an observational study. These results validate the use of clinical worsening as a meaningful prognostic tool in clinical practice and as a primary end point in clinical trial design. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Time to clinical worsening has been proposed as a primary end point in clinical trials of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, neither standardized nor validated definitions of clinical worsening across PAH trials exist. This study aims to evaluate a proposed definition of clinical worsening within a large prospective, observational registry of patients with PAH with respect to its value as a predictor of proximate (within 1 year) risk for subsequent major events (ie, death, transplantation, or atrial septostomy). METHODS: We assessed overall 2-year survival and survival free from major events to determine the relationship between clinical worsening and major events among adults with hemodynamically defined PAH (N = 3,001). Freedom from clinical worsening was defined as freedom from worsening functional class (FC), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), all-cause hospitalization, or the introduction of parenteral prostacyclin analog therapy. RESULTS: In the 2 years of follow-up, 583 patients died. Four hundred twenty-six died after a documented clinical worsening event, including FC worsening (n = 128), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6MWD (n = 118), all-cause hospitalization (n = 370), or introduction of a prostacyclin analog (n = 91). Patients who experienced clinical worsening had significantly poorer subsequent 1-year survival postworsening than patients who did not worsen (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical worsening was highly predictive of subsequent proximate mortality in this analysis from an observational study. These results validate the use of clinical worsening as a meaningful prognostic tool in clinical practice and as a primary end point in clinical trial design. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Thomas A Zelniker; Dörte Huscher; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Ralf Ewert; Tobias J Lange; Hans Klose; Daniel Dumitrescu; Michael Halank; Matthis Held; Henning Gall; David Pittrow; Marius M Hoeper; Lutz Frankenstein Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Lorriana E Leard; Are M Holm; Maryam Valapour; Allan R Glanville; Sandeep Attawar; Meghan Aversa; Silvia V Campos; Lillian M Christon; Marcelo Cypel; Göran Dellgren; Matthew G Hartwig; Siddhartha G Kapnadak; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Robert M Kotloff; Caroline M Patterson; Oksana A Shlobin; Patrick J Smith; Amparo Solé; Melinda Solomon; David Weill; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Brigitte W M Willemse; Selim M Arcasoy; Kathleen J Ramos Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 13.569
Authors: James C Coons; Kristen Pogue; Andrew R Kolodziej; Glenn A Hirsch; Marjorie Patricia George Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Robert P Frantz; Robert J Schilz; Murali M Chakinala; David B Badesch; Adaani E Frost; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Robyn J Barst; Daniel M Rosenberg; Dave P Miller; Brian K Hartline; Wade W Benton; Harrison W Farber Journal: Chest Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Charles D Burger; Pamela K Long; Monarch R Shah; Michael D McGoon; Dave P Miller; Alain J Romero; Wade W Benton; Robert E Safford Journal: Chest Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 9.410