Literature DB >> 23907471

Evaluation of the predictive value of a clinical worsening definition using 2-year outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a REVEAL Registry analysis.

Adaani E Frost1, David B Badesch2, Dave P Miller3, Raymond L Benza4, Leslie A Meltzer5, Michael D McGoon6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Time to clinical worsening has been proposed as a primary end point in clinical trials of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); however, neither standardized nor validated definitions of clinical worsening across PAH trials exist. This study aims to evaluate a proposed definition of clinical worsening within a large prospective, observational registry of patients with PAH with respect to its value as a predictor of proximate (within 1 year) risk for subsequent major events (ie, death, transplantation, or atrial septostomy).
METHODS: We assessed overall 2-year survival and survival free from major events to determine the relationship between clinical worsening and major events among adults with hemodynamically defined PAH (N = 3,001). Freedom from clinical worsening was defined as freedom from worsening functional class (FC), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), all-cause hospitalization, or the introduction of parenteral prostacyclin analog therapy.
RESULTS: In the 2 years of follow-up, 583 patients died. Four hundred twenty-six died after a documented clinical worsening event, including FC worsening (n = 128), a ≥ 15% reduction in 6MWD (n = 118), all-cause hospitalization (n = 370), or introduction of a prostacyclin analog (n = 91). Patients who experienced clinical worsening had significantly poorer subsequent 1-year survival postworsening than patients who did not worsen (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical worsening was highly predictive of subsequent proximate mortality in this analysis from an observational study. These results validate the use of clinical worsening as a meaningful prognostic tool in clinical practice and as a primary end point in clinical trial design. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907471     DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-3023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  19 in total

1.  Assessing risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension: what we know, what we don't.

Authors:  Raymond L Benza; Harrison W Farber; Mona Selej; Mardi Gomberg-Maitland
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 2.  A Contemporary Approach to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Udhay Krishnan; Evelyn M Horn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  The Use of Risk Assessment Tools and Prognostic Scores in Managing Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Manreet Kanwar; Amresh Raina; Lisa Lohmueller; Jidapa Kraisangka; Raymond Benza
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  The 6MWT as a prognostic tool in pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the COMPERA registry.

Authors:  Thomas A Zelniker; Dörte Huscher; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Ralf Ewert; Tobias J Lange; Hans Klose; Daniel Dumitrescu; Michael Halank; Matthis Held; Henning Gall; David Pittrow; Marius M Hoeper; Lutz Frankenstein
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of right ventricular eccentricity index in pulmonary artery hypertension.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Xiaoling Chen; Ke Wan; Chao Gong; Weihao Li; Yuanwei Xu; Jie Wang; Juan He; Bi Wen; Yuchi Han; Rui Zeng; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 6.  Lung transplantation: an overview of candidacy and outcomes.

Authors:  Reinaldo Rampolla
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

7.  Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Lorriana E Leard; Are M Holm; Maryam Valapour; Allan R Glanville; Sandeep Attawar; Meghan Aversa; Silvia V Campos; Lillian M Christon; Marcelo Cypel; Göran Dellgren; Matthew G Hartwig; Siddhartha G Kapnadak; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Robert M Kotloff; Caroline M Patterson; Oksana A Shlobin; Patrick J Smith; Amparo Solé; Melinda Solomon; David Weill; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Brigitte W M Willemse; Selim M Arcasoy; Kathleen J Ramos
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 13.569

Review 8.  Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: a Pharmacotherapeutic Update.

Authors:  James C Coons; Kristen Pogue; Andrew R Kolodziej; Glenn A Hirsch; Marjorie Patricia George
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Hospitalization and survival in patients using epoprostenol for injection in the PROSPECT observational study.

Authors:  Robert P Frantz; Robert J Schilz; Murali M Chakinala; David B Badesch; Adaani E Frost; Vallerie V McLaughlin; Robyn J Barst; Daniel M Rosenberg; Dave P Miller; Brian K Hartline; Wade W Benton; Harrison W Farber
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Characterization of first-time hospitalizations in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension in the REVEAL registry.

Authors:  Charles D Burger; Pamela K Long; Monarch R Shah; Michael D McGoon; Dave P Miller; Alain J Romero; Wade W Benton; Robert E Safford
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.