Shifang Ding1, Oguz Kilickaya2, Serkan Senkal2, Ognjen Gajic2, Rolf D Hubmayr2, Guangxi Li3. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Intensive Care Unit, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing, China. Electronic address: li.guangxi@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in critical care delivery, including the widespread implementation of health-care bundles, were aimed at reducing complications of critical illness, in particular ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but no population-based study evaluated its effectiveness. METHODS: Using a previously validated electronic medical record database, we identified adult (≥ 18 years old) critically ill patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h from January 2003 to December 2009. Trained intensivists identified cases of VAP according to different established clinical definitions. The incidence and outcome of VAP was compared before and after implementation of the so-called "VAP bundle." RESULTS: The median age, severity of illness, proportion of surgical patients, and patients with neurologic disease increased over time (P < .05 for trend in all). Regardless of the definition used, the VAP rate remained similar throughout the study period and did not change with the introduction of the VAP bundle. According to previous Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, the yearly estimates of the VAP incidence ranged between 7.1 and 10.4 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days, with an age-adjusted incidence of 3.1 vs 5.6 per 100,000 population (P = .54 for trends). Standardized hospital mortality ratio of patients at high risk to develop VAP significantly decreased from 1.7 (95% CI, 0.8-3.0) to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.4; P = .0003 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP was unaffected by the implementation of the VAP bundle. Secular changes in hospital mortality are unlikely to be attributed to the VAP bundle per se.
BACKGROUND: Recent changes in critical care delivery, including the widespread implementation of health-care bundles, were aimed at reducing complications of critical illness, in particular ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but no population-based study evaluated its effectiveness. METHODS: Using a previously validated electronic medical record database, we identified adult (≥ 18 years old) critically ill patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h from January 2003 to December 2009. Trained intensivists identified cases of VAP according to different established clinical definitions. The incidence and outcome of VAP was compared before and after implementation of the so-called "VAP bundle." RESULTS: The median age, severity of illness, proportion of surgical patients, and patients with neurologic disease increased over time (P &lt; .05 for trend in all). Regardless of the definition used, the VAP rate remained similar throughout the study period and did not change with the introduction of the VAP bundle. According to previous Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, the yearly estimates of the VAP incidence ranged between 7.1 and 10.4 cases per 1,000 ventilator-days, with an age-adjusted incidence of 3.1 vs 5.6 per 100,000 population (P = .54 for trends). Standardized hospital mortality ratio of patients at high risk to develop VAP significantly decreased from 1.7 (95% CI, 0.8-3.0) to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.4; P = .0003 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VAP was unaffected by the implementation of the VAP bundle. Secular changes in hospital mortality are unlikely to be attributed to the VAP bundle per se.
Authors: Jonathan R Edwards; Kelly D Peterson; Yi Mu; Shailendra Banerjee; Katherine Allen-Bridson; Gloria Morrell; Margaret A Dudeck; Daniel A Pollock; Teresa C Horan Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Grace M Lee; Ken Kleinman; Stephen B Soumerai; Alison Tse; David Cole; Scott K Fridkin; Teresa Horan; Richard Platt; Charlene Gay; William Kassler; Donald A Goldmann; John Jernigan; Ashish K Jha Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bekele Afessa; Mark T Keegan; Rolf D Hubmayr; James M Naessens; Ognjen Gajic; Kirsten Hall Long; Steve G Peters Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Eva Tejerina; Andrés Esteban; Pilar Fernández-Segoviano; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; José Aramburu; Daniel Ballesteros; José María Rodríguez-Barbero Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Victor Zaydfudim; Lesly A Dossett; John M Starmer; Patrick G Arbogast; Irene D Feurer; Wayne A Ray; Addison K May; C Wright Pinson Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2009-07
Authors: Kyle H Sheetz; Robert W Krell; Michael J Englesbe; John D Birkmeyer; Darrell A Campbell; Amir A Ghaferi Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: G Matthes; H Trentzsch; C G Wölfl; T Paffrath; S Flohe; U Schweigkofler; A Ekkernkamp; S Schulz-Drost Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Haitao Lan; Charat Thongprayoon; Adil Ahmed; Vitaly Herasevich; Priya Sampathkumar; Ognjen Gajic; John C O'Horo Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Javier de Miguel-Díez; Ana López-de-Andrés; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Benito Del Rio-Lopez; Rodrigo Jiménez-García Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Ana López-de-Andrés; Napoleon Perez-Farinos; Javier de Miguel-Díez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Rodrigo Jiménez-García Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240