Literature DB >> 23907295

Interphyletic relationships in the use of nesting cavities: mutualism, competition and amensalism among hymenopterans and vertebrates.

José P Veiga1, Wanyoike Wamiti, Vicente Polo, Muchane Muchai.   

Abstract

Although competition is usually assumed to be the most common interaction between closely related organisms that share limiting resources, the relationships linking distant taxa that use the same nesting sites are poorly understood. In the present study, we examine the interactions among social hymenopterans (honeybees and wasps) and vertebrates in tropical ecosystems of East Africa. By analysing the preferences of these three groups for nest boxes that were empty or previously occupied by a different taxon, we try to establish whether the relationships among them are commensal, mutualistic, competitive or amensal. Vertebrates and honeybees selected nest boxes that had previously been occupied by the other, which suggests that each obtains some benefit from the other. This relationship can be considered mutualistic, although a mutual preference for each others' nests does not exclude a competitive interaction. Vertebrates and wasps preferred nest boxes not previously occupied by the other, which suggests that they compete for tree cavities. Finally, wasps seemed to completely refuse cavities previously used by honeybees, while the bees occupied cavities regardless of whether they had been previously used by wasps, an apparently amensal relationship. These results indicate that the interdependence between distantly related taxa is stronger and more complex than previously described, which may have important implications for population dynamics and community structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23907295     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1082-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  11 in total

1.  Competition between kingdoms.

Authors:  M E Hochberg; J H Lawton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  The ecology of nest movement in social insects.

Authors:  Terrence P McGlynn
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Interacting effects of aromatic plants and female age on nest-dwelling ectoparasites and blood-sucking flies in avian nests.

Authors:  G Tomás; S Merino; J Martínez-de la Puente; J Moreno; J Morales; E Lobato; J Rivero-de Aguilar; S Del Cerro
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Nesting distributions of Galápagos boobies (Aves: Sulidae): an apparent case of amensalism.

Authors:  Howard M Townsend; Kathryn P Huyvaert; Peter J Hodum; David J Anderson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection against blood-sucking flying insects?

Authors:  Lucile Lafuma; Marcel M. Lambrechts; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Bee threat elicits alarm call in African elephants.

Authors:  Lucy E King; Joseph Soltis; Iain Douglas-Hamilton; Anne Savage; Fritz Vollrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Antimicrobial chemicals in hoopoe preen secretions are produced by symbiotic bacteria.

Authors:  Manuel Martín-Vivaldi; Aránzazu Peña; Juan Manuel Peralta-Sánchez; Lourdes Sánchez; Samir Ananou; Magdalena Ruiz-Rodríguez; Juan José Soler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Heat and carbon dioxide generated by honeybees jointly act to kill hornets.

Authors:  Michio Sugahara; Fumio Sakamoto
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-06-24

9.  Initiation of absconding-swarm emigration in the social wasp Polybia occidentalis.

Authors:  Peter J Sonnentag; Robert L Jeanne
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Social waves in giant honeybees repel hornets.

Authors:  Gerald Kastberger; Evelyn Schmelzer; Ilse Kranner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.