Literature DB >> 23906936

Changes in gait patterns and muscle activity following total hip arthroplasty: a six-month follow-up.

Thomas Horstmann1, Rico Listringhaus, Götz-Bernhard Haase, Stefan Grau, Annegret Mündermann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate gait function is an important determinant of the outcome of total hip arthroplasty and relies on appropriate joint motion and muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6-month postoperative dynamic joint range of motion, time-distance measures and muscle activity in the operated limb in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty differ from preoperative levels and are more similar to those observed postoperatively in the contralateral limb and in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Basic time-distance gait measurements, knee and hip kinematics and electromyographic activity from eight hip muscles were obtained preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively in 52 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and in 24 age-matched healthy subjects during treadmill walking.
FINDINGS: Postoperative dynamic hip range of motion for the operated limb (confidence interval differences [-3.9°; -2.3°]) and postoperative knee range of motion for both limbs (operated: [-8.4°; -5.6°]; contralateral: [-8.1°; -5.3°]) in patients with total hip arthroplasty were significantly lower than values for the control subjects (P<0.001). Postoperative gait in patients with total hip arthroplasty was more symmetric than preoperative gait. Preoperative and postoperative electromyographic intensities were higher in patients with total hip arthroplasty than values for the control subjects (P<0.001), and patients had different EMG patterns compared to the control group.
INTERPRETATION: Pre- and postoperative differences not only in hip but also in knee kinematics emphasize the importance of evaluating the dynamic outcome of total hip arthroplasty by assessing joint motion of all lower extremity joints in both legs.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; Gait function; Gait symmetry; Total hip replacement; Transgluteal approach

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23906936     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  9 in total

1.  Simulated hip abductor strengthening reduces peak joint contact forces in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Peter J Laz; Kevin B Shelburne; Dana L Judd; Joshua D Winters; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Sports Therapy Interventions Following Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Heidrun Beck; Franziska Beyer; Franziska Gering; Klaus-Peter Günther; Cornelia Lützner; Achim Walther; Maik Stiehler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Kinematic Gait Analysis After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review: Gait After Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luis Mendiolagoitia; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez; Irene Crespo; Miguel Del Valle; Hugo Olmedillas
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Hip abductor strength and fatigue are associated with activity levels more than 1 year after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Kharma C Foucher; Christopher C Cinnamon; Colleen A Ryan; Samuel J Chmell; Kris Dapiton
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  The effects of preoperative chronic opioid use in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kelvin Kim; Kevin K Chen; Mackenzie Roof; Afshin A Anoushiravani; Jonathan Vigdorchik; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-30

6.  Quantifying Pelvic Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Region-Free Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Parker; Lang Yang; Mohsen Farzi; José M Pozo; Alejandro F Frangi; J Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Validity and reliability of evaluating hip abductor strength using different normalization methods in a functional electromechanical device.

Authors:  Enrique Cerda Vega; Daniel Jerez-Mayorga; Ramón Machado Payer; Christian Campos Jara; Iris Guzman-Guzman; Alvaro Reyes Ponce; Luis Javier Chirosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Refining muscle geometry and wrapping in the TLEM 2 model for improved hip contact force prediction.

Authors:  Enrico De Pieri; Morten E Lund; Anantharaman Gopalakrishnan; Kasper P Rasmussen; David E Lunn; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interpretability of Input Representations for Gait Classification in Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carlo Dindorf; Wolfgang Teufl; Bertram Taetz; Gabriele Bleser; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.