PURPOSE: We conducted an evaluation to identify factors related to intensive care unit (ICU) staff acceptance of a telemedicine ICU (Tele-ICU) program in preimplementation and postimplementation phases. METHODS: Individual or group semistructured interviews and site observations were conducted with staff from the Veterans Affairs Midwest Health Care Network Tele-ICU and affiliated ICUs. A qualitative content analysis of preimplementation and postimplementation transcripts and field notes was undertaken to identify themes positively and negatively influencing Tele-ICU acceptance. RESULTS: Telemedicine ICU training, Tele-ICU understanding, perceived need, and organizational factors emerged as influencing acceptance of the Tele-ICU before implementation. After implementation, Tele-ICU understanding, impact on work systems, perceived usefulness, and relationships were factors influencing acceptance and utilization. Barriers to implementation included confusion about how to use the Tele-ICU, disruptions to communication and workflows, unmet expectations, and discomfort with being monitored. Facilitators included positive experiences, discovery of new benefits, and recognition of Tele-ICU staff as complementing bedside care. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine ICU implementation is complex. Time and resources should be allocated for local coordination, continuous needs assessment for Tele-ICU support, staff training, developing interpersonal relationships, and systems design and evaluation. Such efforts are likely to be rewarded with more rapid staff acceptance of this new technology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: We conducted an evaluation to identify factors related to intensive care unit (ICU) staff acceptance of a telemedicine ICU (Tele-ICU) program in preimplementation and postimplementation phases. METHODS: Individual or group semistructured interviews and site observations were conducted with staff from the Veterans Affairs Midwest Health Care Network Tele-ICU and affiliated ICUs. A qualitative content analysis of preimplementation and postimplementation transcripts and field notes was undertaken to identify themes positively and negatively influencing Tele-ICU acceptance. RESULTS: Telemedicine ICU training, Tele-ICU understanding, perceived need, and organizational factors emerged as influencing acceptance of the Tele-ICU before implementation. After implementation, Tele-ICU understanding, impact on work systems, perceived usefulness, and relationships were factors influencing acceptance and utilization. Barriers to implementation included confusion about how to use the Tele-ICU, disruptions to communication and workflows, unmet expectations, and discomfort with being monitored. Facilitators included positive experiences, discovery of new benefits, and recognition of Tele-ICU staff as complementing bedside care. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine ICU implementation is complex. Time and resources should be allocated for local coordination, continuous needs assessment for Tele-ICU support, staff training, developing interpersonal relationships, and systems design and evaluation. Such efforts are likely to be rewarded with more rapid staff acceptance of this new technology. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Keywords:
Attitude of health personnel; Implementation; Telemedicine intensive care unit
Authors: Amy M J O'Shea; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Boulos Nassar; Peter Cram; Lynelle Johnson; Robert Bonello; Ralph J Panos; Heather S Reisinger Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mirna Becevic; Martina A Clarke; Mohammed M Alnijoumi; Harjyot S Sohal; Suzanne A Boren; Min S Kim; Rachel Mutrux Journal: Perspect Health Inf Manag Date: 2015-07-01
Authors: Jeremy M Kahn; Tri Q Le; Amber E Barnato; Marilyn Hravnak; Courtney C Kuza; Francis Pike; Derek C Angus Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Emilie S Powell; William F Bond; Lisa T Barker; Kimberly Cooley; Julia Lee; Andrew L Vincent; John A Vozenilek Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 2.243
Authors: Kimberly J Rak; Courtney C Kuza; Laura Ellen Ashcraft; Penelope K Morrison; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Marilyn Hravnak; Tina B Hershey; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Int J Qual Methods Date: 2017-10-06