OBJECTIVE: To review the characteristics, outcomes and toxicities of cervical cancer patients treated with 6 fractions of brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: All patients diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2000 to 2009 who were referred for radical treatment and who received 6 fractions of brachytherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local control (LC), distant control (DC) rate, acute and late toxicities were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with mainly advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma were identified and reviewed. Patients received EBRT of 45 to 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions followed by 6 sessions of 3 channel brachytherapy of 5.3 Gy prescribed to point H. Response rates to treatment were good, with no residual disease in 84% six weeks after the completion of treatment. With a median follow up time of 8.1 years, the five-year OS, DFS, LC and distant control rates were 75%, 68.5%, 92.8% and 76.9% respectively. None of the patients developed any G3-4 acute toxicity but one patient who had advanced disease developed G3-4 proctitis with a fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy utilizing 6 fractions of 5.3 Gy prescribed to point H with concurrent chemo-radiation is superior in terms of OS and LC to regimens that deliver a lower EQD2 dose to point A/H and is associated with very low rates of toxicities.
OBJECTIVE: To review the characteristics, outcomes and toxicities of cervical cancerpatients treated with 6 fractions of brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: All patients diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2000 to 2009 who were referred for radical treatment and who received 6 fractions of brachytherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local control (LC), distant control (DC) rate, acute and late toxicities were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with mainly advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma were identified and reviewed. Patients received EBRT of 45 to 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions followed by 6 sessions of 3 channel brachytherapy of 5.3 Gy prescribed to point H. Response rates to treatment were good, with no residual disease in 84% six weeks after the completion of treatment. With a median follow up time of 8.1 years, the five-year OS, DFS, LC and distant control rates were 75%, 68.5%, 92.8% and 76.9% respectively. None of the patients developed any G3-4 acute toxicity but one patient who had advanced disease developed G3-4 proctitis with a fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy utilizing 6 fractions of 5.3 Gy prescribed to point H with concurrent chemo-radiation is superior in terms of OS and LC to regimens that deliver a lower EQD2 dose to point A/H and is associated with very low rates of toxicities.