Literature DB >> 23906148

Spatial stochastic models of cancer: fitness, migration, invasion.

Natalia L Komarova1.   

Abstract

Cancer progression is driven by genetic and epigenetic events giving rise to heterogeneity of cell phenotypes, and by selection forces that shape the changing composition of tumors. The selection forces are dynamic and depend on many factors. The cells favored by selection are said to be more 'fit'than others. They tend to leave more viable offspring and spread through the population. What cellular characteristics make certain cells more fit than others? What combinations of the mutant characteristics and 'background' characteristics make the mutant cells win the evolutionary competition? In this review we concentrate on two phenotypic characteristics of cells: their reproductive potential and their motility. We show that migration has a direct positive impact on the ability of a single mutant cell to invade a pre-existing colony. Thus, a decrease in the reproductive potential can be compensated by an increase in cell migration. We further demonstrate that the neutral ridges (the set of all types with the invasion probability equal to that of the host cells) remain invariant under the increase of system size (for large system sizes), thus making the invasion probability a universal characteristic of the cells' selection status. We list very general conditions under which the optimal phenotype is just one single strategy (thus leading to a nearly-homogeneous type invading the colony), or a large set of strategies that differ by their reproductive potentials and migration characteristics, but have a nearly-equal fitness. In the latter case the evolutionary competition will result in a highly heterogeneous population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23906148     DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci Eng        ISSN: 1547-1063            Impact factor:   2.080


  7 in total

1.  Edge effects in game-theoretic dynamics of spatially structured tumours.

Authors:  Artem Kaznatcheev; Jacob G Scott; David Basanta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Spatial Moran models, II: cancer initiation in spatially structured tissue.

Authors:  R Durrett; J Foo; K Leder
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Spatial Measures of Genetic Heterogeneity During Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  K Storey; M D Ryser; K Leder; J Foo
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  A spatial model predicts that dispersal and cell turnover limit intratumour heterogeneity.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Waclaw; Ivana Bozic; Meredith E Pittman; Ralph H Hruban; Bert Vogelstein; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multifocality and recurrence risk: a quantitative model of field cancerization.

Authors:  Jasmine Foo; Kevin Leder; Marc D Ryser
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Oncogenic functions of IGF1R and INSR in prostate cancer include enhanced tumor growth, cell migration and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Isabel Heidegger; Johann Kern; Philipp Ofer; Helmut Klocker; Petra Massoner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Modeling the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Cancer Stem Cells with Ordinary Differential Equations.

Authors:  Kristen Abernathy; Jeremy Burke
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.238

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.