Literature DB >> 23905077

Genetic test for dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies: useful or less than useful for patients?

F Pastore1, V Parisi, R Romano, G Rengo, G Pagano, K Komici, D Leosco.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for potentially heritable cardiomyopathies has advanced from basic scientific discovery to clinical application. Nowadays, genetic diagnostic tests for cardiomyopathies are clinically available. As a consequence is fundamental the understanding of the clinical utility, in terms of diagnosis and prognosis, of genetic test results. In addition, the genetic counselling, regarding risks, benefits and options, is recommended for all patients and their relatives. However the relation between genotype and phenotype remains often unclear, and there is frequently a variance of uncertain significance. Consequently, the genetic test should always be approached as one component of a comprehensive cardio-genetic evaluation. This review aims to explore when genetic tests are indicated in patients with dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dilated Cardiomyopathy; Genetic Testing; Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Year:  2013        PMID: 23905077      PMCID: PMC3728810     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Med UniSa        ISSN: 2239-9747


INTRODUCTION

The first gene-mutation causing cardiomyopathy was discovered more than thirty years ago. Nowadays the genic-mutations are at least 500 just for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. However, the clinical beneficial of a genetic-test result remains often unclear and questionable. Usually, the first approach to a patient with a cardiomyopathy is guided by the phenotype. Anamnesis and instrumental investigations, and above all electrocardiography and echocardiography, are extremely useful. Another diagnostic investigation, performed in specialized centres, is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is very important to characterize the muscle tissue and the interstitial space. A detailed family history could guide the diagnosis of a familial genetic disease, although there is the possibility of a de novo mutation that should be suspected in the absence of a positive family history for disease. Different mutations in the same gene might cause different disease phenotype and different disease severity. For example laminin A/C mutations might cause isolated Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM), Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy, or disorders without DCM. Cardiologists should know the feasibility of a genetic diagnosis, its clinical relevance and its potential impact on prognosis. Another fundamental aspect is the genetic counselling, finalized to discuss the significance of the identification of the genetic mutation with the patient and its relevance in his/her life. Contrary to common misperception, genetic tests are probabilistic and not deterministic tests. Many positive tests are represented by DNA variants of uncertain clinical significance. The genetic testing for cardiomyopathies has some ethical problems: is it right to consider sick a patient with a mutation indicative of disease if he might never show the phenotype?

DILATATED CARDIOMYOPATHY

Dilated Cardiomyopathy is characterized by the systolic dysfunction and the left ventricular (LV) dilatation with the progressive LV failure. Although this disease has various etiopathogenesis, the term cardiomyopathy refers to genetic cardiomyopathy. Baig et al showed that the patient with DCM have a familiar DCM for 48% of cases, when asymptomatic LV dysfunction was considered the first sign on DCM [1-3]. The familiar screening is strongly recommended in familiar of patients with DCM [4]. However the role of genetic test is unclear. Genetic test for dilated Cardiomyopathy. More than 30 genes have been identified as cause of DCM showing a marked locus heterogeneity. The genes implicated encode proteins involved in the structure of the cardiomyocyte as cytoskeletal proteins, myofilament proteins and ion channels. Mitochondrial defects have also been identified(Table 1)[5]. This heterogeneity highlights the various mechanisms involved in DCM. This disease is likely final phenotype of reduced contractile force of cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, some mutations of the genes causing DCM can cause also hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), clarifying the importance of secondary factors as modifiers genes and environment to determine the phenotype. Most genetic DCM inheritance follows an autosomal dominant pattern, although X-linked, recessive, and mitochondrial patterns of inheritance occur. The sensitivity of genetic is estimated at 20% and none of genes appears to account for 5% of familial DCM. This low sensitivity is very important and it underlines the little diagnostic power of genetic testing in not-selected people. The sensitivity is higher in specific forms as the DCMs associated with conduction defects. Genetic DCM shows age-dependent penetrance and a variable expression. The same mutation can result in a different phenotype in members of the same family, underlying the importance of others factors [6]. Some mutations are more aggressive and they can often cause sudden death, e.g. mutations of laminin and desmin [7].
Table 1.

Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM): genes mutated in DCM.

The most common genes mutated in DCM and the proteins that they codified for. Modified from: Hershberger RE, Morales A, Siegfried JD. Clinical and Genetic Issues in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: a Review for Genetics Professionals. Genet Med 2010; 12(11): 655–67.

GeneProteinFunction
ACTCcardiac actinSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
DESdesminDAGC; transduces contractile forces
SGCDδ-sarcoglycanDAGC; transduces contractile forces
MYH7β-myosin heavy chainSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
TNNT2cardiac troponin TSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
TPM1α-tropomyosinSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
TTNtitinSarcomere structure/extensible scaffold for proteins
VCLmetavinculinSarcomere structure; intercalated discs
MYBPC3myosin-binding protein CSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
MLP/CSRP3muscle LIM proteinSarcomere stretch sensor/ Z discs
ACTN2α-actinin-2Sarcomere structure; anchor for myofibrillar actin
PLNphospholambanSarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++ regulator; inhibits SERCA2 pump
ZASP/LDB3CypherCytoskeletal assembly; targeting/clustering of membrane proteins
MYH6α-myosin heavy chainSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
ABCC9SUR2AKir6.2 regulatory subunit, inwardly rectifying cardiac KATP channel
TNNC1cardiac troponin CSarcomeric protein; muscle contraction
titin-cap TCAPtitin-cap or telethoninZ-disc protein that associates with titin; aids sarcomere assembly
TNNI3cardiac troponin Isarcomeric protein, muscle contraction; also seen as recessive
EYA4eyes-absent 4Transcriptional coactivators (Six and Dach)
TMPOthymopoietinAlso LAP2; a lamin-associated nuclear protein
PSEN1/2presenilin 1 / 2Transmembrane proteins, gamma secretase activity
CRYABalpha B crystalinCytoskeletal protein
PDLIM3PDZ LIM domain protein 3Cytoskeletal protein
MYPNmyopalladinSarcomeric protein, z-disc
LAMA4laminin a-4Extracellular matrix protein
ILKintegrin-linked kinaseIntracellular ser-threo kinase; interacts with integrins
RBM20RNA binding protein 20RNA binding protein of the spliceosome
LMNAlamin A/CStructure/stability of inner nuclear membrane
SCN5Asodium channelControls sodium ion flux
DMDdystrophinDAGC; transduces contractile force
When the mutation of the proband is known, the family genetic screening is very helpful to diagnose eventual early DCM. However clinicians should always keep in mind that, considered the heterogeneity of expression, some carriers would never develop the disease. The family screening is mandatory for the aggressive gene-mutations as mutations of laminin. Indeed the gene testing changes prognosis only for laminin mutations. In conclusion, clinically the genetic testing is recommended only for family screening and especially for aggressive mutations (table 2). However, it is very important to evaluate the mutations for research purposes, especially for possible gene therapy in future.
Table 2

Recommendations to genetic testing in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Modified from HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for the Channelopathies and Cardiomyopathies [16]

STATE OF GENETIC TESTING FOR DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY (DCM)
Class I
  ✓Patients with a clinical diagnosis of DCM and significant cardiac conduction disease and/or a family history of premature unexpected sudden death have been recommended for a comprehensive or targeted (LMNA and SCN5A) DCM genetic testing.
  ✓Family members and appropriate relatives of an index case have been recommended for a mutation-specific genetic testing

Class IIa
  ✓Patients with familial DCM have been recommended for genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis, to recognize those who are at highest risk of arrhythmia and syndromic features, to facilitate cascade screening within the family, and to help with family planning.

HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common disease, that affects 1 in 500 people [8]. Usually it is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait, instead de novo mutations are rare [9]. The phenotype of a patient with HCM is characterized by asymmetrical cardiac hypertrophy, that doesn’t have any evident cause, myocyte disarray, and fibrosis. Patients show a marked phenotypic variability, even within the same family, and an incomplete penetrance [8]. HCM is one of the most frequently identified causes of sudden cardiac death caused by the high prevalence of malignant arrhythmias. Although many patients with HCM are asymptomatic and sudden death may be unpredictable, genetic screening in families is essential for prevention. Mutations in MYH7 and MYBPC3 genes, that encod for the beta-myosin heavy chain and the cardiac myosin binding protein-C, are present in about 80% of HCM cases [10,11]. Mutations in other genes, such as TNNT2, TNNI3, and TPM1, encod for proteins of the troponin complex and occur in 10% to 15% of HCM patients [12]. 9 genes are used for genetic testing. Considering all genetic testing these 9 genes, a mutation is identified in 40% to 60% of sporadic and familial cases[10]. Anyway, the relation between genotype and phenotype remains elusive, because of extreme genetic heterogeneity, variation in penetrance and expressivity, even considering individuals carrying identical mutations. Cases with a negative HCM genetic test might have HCM-causing mutations in unexplored regions within the known HCM genes or in undiscovered genes. Rarely the phenotype is related to underlying HCM disease gene, and so it might bepoorlyuseful for managing patients. Mutations in MYH7 alleles usually are associated with an important clinical disease expression. Instead, mutations in MYBPC3 alleles have been associated with later onset disease [13]. Patients with TNNT2 mutations usually show a lower severity of LV hypertrophy but a higher arrhythmia risk [14]. Only few specific mutations might carry a prognostic implication. That is the reason why a genetic test result in isolation will not constitute an indication for an ICD for primary prevention. In conclusion, genetic testing is recommended for patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM when the genetic testing benefit family members and potentially other relatives (table 3). It is recommended in families with a history of sudden death, in families in which numerous relatives are at risk and that need periodic clinical evaluation without the genetic testing, and when the clinical diagnosis is difficult. It might be recommended even thegenetic analysis of post mortem samples if there is a case of sudden death in a family where HCM was not previously known. Family screening is recommended for all first-degree relatives and it is important also for cost-effectiveness reasons. Indeed, when a family member has anegative genetic testing result, he/she can be discharged and there is no reason for clinical investigations or long-term follow-up [15]. Long-term studies are required to accumulate reliable evidence on genotype–phenotype relations.
Table 3

Recommendations to genetic testing for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Modified from HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for the Channelopathies and Cardiomyopathies [16]

STATE OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY (HCM)
Class I
  ✓Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM based on examination of the patient’s clinical history, family history, and electrocardiographic echocardiographic phenotype have been recommended for a comprehensive or targeted (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNI3, TNNT2, TPM1) HCM genetic testing
  ✓Family members and appropriate relatives of an index case have been recommended for a mutation-specific genetic testing.
  15 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; William J McKenna; Gordon K Danielson; Lukas J Kappenberger; Horst J Kuhn; Christine E Seidman; Pravin M Shah; William H Spencer; Paolo Spirito; Folkert J Ten Cate; E Douglas Wigle
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  DNA testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a cost-effectiveness model.

Authors:  Sarah Wordsworth; José Leal; Edward Blair; Rosa Legood; Kate Thomson; Anneke Seller; Jenny Taylor; Hugh Watkins
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  The frequency of familial dilated cardiomyopathy in a series of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  V V Michels; P P Moll; F A Miller; A J Tajik; J S Chu; D J Driscoll; J C Burnett; R J Rodeheffer; J H Chesebro; H D Tazelaar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies: this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Silvia G Priori; Stephan Willems; Charles Berul; Ramon Brugada; Hugh Calkins; A John Camm; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael Gollob; Robert Hamilton; Ray E Hershberger; Daniel P Judge; Hervè Le Marec; William J McKenna; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Chris Semsarian; Jeffrey A Towbin; Hugh Watkins; Arthur Wilde; Christian Wolpert; Douglas P Zipes
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Mutations in the gene for cardiac myosin-binding protein C and late-onset familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  H Niimura; L L Bachinski; S Sangwatanaroj; H Watkins; A E Chudley; W McKenna; A Kristinsson; R Roberts; M Sole; B J Maron; J G Seidman; C E Seidman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  John Lynn Jefferies; Jeffrey A Towbin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Yield of genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Sara L Van Driest; Steve R Ommen; A Jamil Tajik; Bernard J Gersh; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Frequency and phenotypes of familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  E Grünig; J A Tasman; H Kücherer; W Franz; W Kübler; H A Katus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Genetic determinants of cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Ali J Marian
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy--a Heart Failure Society of America practice guideline.

Authors:  Ray E Hershberger; Joann Lindenfeld; Luisa Mestroni; Christine E Seidman; Matthew R G Taylor; Jeffrey A Towbin
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Course and Treatment of Dilated Cardiomyopathy During Twenty Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Edin Begic; Zijo Begic; Nabil Naser
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2018-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.