Literature DB >> 23905034

Adrenergic mechanism in the control of endothelial function.

Daniela Sorriento1, Bruno Trimarco, Guido Iaccarino.   

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that many disease are associated with endothelial dysfunction and reduced nitric oxide production such as hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemias, diabetes, heart failure, atherosclerosis. Notably these conditions are also characterized by alteration in the adrenergic tone. Whether these two mechanisms are just epiphenomenal each other or there is a functional link, it is still to be established. A starting ground to establish this issue is that vascular endothelium plays an important role in the function of cardiovascular system and that adrenergic receptors on endothelial cells contribute to the regulation of vasomotor tone. The aim of this excerpt is to review current knowledge on the physiology of endothelial adrenergic receptors to contribute to the basis for newer and better approaches to endothelial dysfunction in the setup of cardiovascular conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23905034      PMCID: PMC3728849     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Med UniSa        ISSN: 2239-9747


Introduction

The endothelium controls several vascular functions, including vasculature tone and permeability, thrombosis, hemostasis and angiogenesis1–4. It is noteworthy that all these functions can be regulated by the activation of receptors and often the same receptor can activate multiple endothelial functions. The adrenergic system is the major regulator of cardiac and vascular function and of endothelial vasorelaxation by means of α and β adrenergic receptors activation. The adrenergic receptors (ARs) are part of a large family of G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) which mediate the functional effects of catecholamines like epinephrine and norepinephrine. The ARs family includes three β (β1, β2, β3), three α1 (α1A, α1B, α1D) and three α2 (α2A, α2B, α2C) receptor subtypes. These receptors actively participate to the release of nitric oxide (NO) in order to regulate endothelial function5. NO plays a crucial role in endothelium homeostasis, with important vasodilatory, anti-thrombotic and anti-atherogenic properties. NO mediates most of the endothelial functions: it has been invoked as a mechanism in vasorelaxation, endothelium permeability and neoangiogenesis3. NO in the endothelium is constitutively produced by the endothelial NO synthase, eNOS6. This latter is then further activated through calcium levels 7 and phosphorylation of various serine residues by a number of protein kinases 8, 9. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that NO is activated by means of the PI3K pathway in response to the stimulation of tyrosine kinase 10,11. The impaired ability of vascular endothelium to stimulate vasodilation is referred to as “Endothelial Dysfunction” and the major cause is the decreased bioavailability of NO in different conditions which can be due to various mechanisms: reduced eNOS expression, altered NO production and increased NO catabolism. Endothelial dysfunction plays a key role in the development of cardiovascular disease such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes and heart failure. The identification of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms will lead to the discovery of newer and more potent tools to treat such diseases. On this issue, endothelial dysfunction has been associated to signal transduction abnormalities observed in hypertension. In particular, adrenergic vasorelaxation has been demonstrated to be impaired in hypertensive patients, probably due to the presence of increased desensitization and impaired signalling of βAR. Adrenergic receptors on endothelium have been longely not considered functional to the regulation of the vascular tone. On the contrary, it is possible to identify very specific roles for such receptors in several endothelial function. This review will summarize the effects of adrenergic receptors on endothelial functions, focusing on modulation of NO synthesis and angiogenesis.

α adrenergic receptors

αAR are GPCRs that couple to Gαq protein. The Gαq subunit is a primary activator of phospholipase C (PLC). Activation of PLC promotes the cleavage of the inositol substrate phosphatidyl-inositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PIP2) to yield diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). DAG and IP3 promote the activation of a protein kinase C (PKC). α1AR can also activate specific adenylate (adenylyl) cyclases (AC) leading to an increase in cAMP levels. The activation of specific PLCs and ACs requires a complex balance of signals from G-proteins, especially the Gα subunits, within specific cell contexts. DAG and cAMP are second messengers that affect a wide array of cell signaling pathways and responses.

α1AR and Nitric oxide

Several reports 12, 13 have produced evidence for the functional presence of vasorelaxant α1AR in the brachial and pulmonary arteries isolated from the rabbit and rat, respectively. According to these reports, the pharmacological stimulation of α1AR located on endothelial cells, is able to generate NO, whereas the stimulation of α2AR releases a relaxing prostanoid12, 13. Filippi demonstrated that nanomolar concentrations of phenylephrine, which are devoid of any contractile effect, induced a slight endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in the rat mesenteric vascular bed through the stimulation of α1DAR, located on endothelial cells, which act through phospholipase C stimulation, followed by IP1 generation, and nitric-oxide synthase activation. Conversely, the increase in perfusion pressure induced by micromolar concentrations of phenylephrine is attributable to the stimulation of α1AAR14.

α1AR and angiogenesis

Neo-angiogenesis has long been known to be a highly ordered multistep molecular process under tight regulation by endothelial cells15 and closely associated with endothelial cell proliferation and migration and to the capability of these cells to modulate the levels of VEGF, the most important cytokine system involved in the formation of new vessels16. A series of biological, chemical, hormonal effectors can interfere with this process. Several data support the notion that α1-adrenergic receptor should also be ranked among these agents. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the α1A- and the α1B-AR subtypes but not the α1D subtype are expressed in cultured rat aorta endothelial cells. The activation of these α1-AR in endothelial cells provide a negative regulation of angiogenesis17. Indeed, pharmacological antagonism of α1-AR in endothelial cells from WKY rats by doxazosin enhanced, while stimulation of these adrenergic receptors with phenylephrine, inhibited endothelial mechanisms of angiogenesis such as cell proliferation and DNA synthesis, ERK and retinoblastoma protein (Rb) phosphorylation, cell migration and tubule formation17. A similar phenotype can be observed in vivo, since an increased α1-adrenergic receptor density in the ischaemic hindlimb, compared to non-ischaemic hindlimb, suggested an enhanced α1-adrenergic receptor tone in the ischaemic tissue. Treatment with doxazosin did not alter systemic blood pressure but enhanced neo-angiogenesis in the ischaemic hindlimb17.

α2ARand Nitric oxide

It has been demonstrated that α2 adrenergic agonists cause endothelium dependent relaxation, that is reduced or abolished by inhibitors of L-arginine/NO pathway. It depends on the activation of α2AR on endothelial cells which stimulates the release of NO, an action that would tend to attenuate vasoconstriction produced by the activation of post-junctional vascular α1AR18–20. The α2AR subtype that cause endothelium dependent relaxation belongs to the α2A/D subtype, despite the prominent presence of α2CAR (77% of α2C versus 23% of α2A/D)21. It appears that this ratio may not be constant, since it varies within the vascular bed. Indeed, Bockman demonstrated that in the rat mesenteric artery the α2AR is coupled to endothelium dependent NO-mediated relaxations and belongs to the α2A/D subtype appearing in its α2D version 22. It has been demonstrated that endothelium dependent relaxation to α2 adrenergic agonists is prevented by pertussis toxin 23–28, suggesting the involvement of Gi proteins in the signal transduction from the receptor to the activation of nitric oxide synthase 29, 30. Indeed, α2 adrenergic agonists cause activation of Gi proteins in endothelial cells and stimulate NO synthase activity 31, 32. Contrary to what expected, cAMP is not involved in the signal transduction pathway for α2A/DAR mediated NO formation 22. Indeed, the use of forskolin to oppose α2 adrenergic receptor mediated inhibition of cAMP formation in endothelium did not affect the relaxant response to α2AR agonists, suggesting that cAMP is not involved in the coupling of α2AR to NO. There are physiological modulation of endothelium dependent relaxation to α2 adrenergic agonists. Such relaxation is upregulated by chronic increase in blood flow 33 or exercise training 34. Insulin enhances NO mediated vasorelaxation both in animal 25 and human 32 vasculature.

β-adrenergic receptors

βARs signal by coupling to the stimulatory G protein, Gs, leads to the activation of adenylyl cyclase and accumulation of the second messenger cAMP35, 36. However, recent studies indicate that under certain conditions βAR, and particularly β2AR, can couple to Gi as well as to Gs 37–41. It is now widely accepted that βAR exist on endothelial cells 10, 38, 40, 42 and contribute to the regulation of vasomotor tone. βAR are classically known to be present in the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) where they cause vasodilation. The relative relevance of endothelial VSMC in adrenergic vasodilation is demonstrated by the observation that, in presence of intact endothelium, vasorelaxation to βAR agonist, isoproterenol (ISO), is sensitive to low doses of ISO (10−10M-10−8M). On the contrary, in absence of endothelium, the vasorelaxation is sensitive to higher doses of ISO (10−7M-10−5M). This appears to hold true through experimental models (rat or man) and vascular districts (see Figure 1).
Figure 1:

βAR vasodilation is impaired in hypertension: A) In hypertensive patients, forearm vasodilation to ISO yielded an increase in forearm blood flow that was significantly lower to that observed in normotensive patients, at each dose of ISO. B) In hypertensive rats SHR, βAR-induced vasorelaxation to ISO in control-treated carotids was significantly impaired compared with that observed in normotensive WKY(* F= 5.756, p< 0.01, 2-way ANOVA).

β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors

It is now recognized that βAR located in the endothelium play an important role in the relaxant response to ISO, since the non selective β1-and β2-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol antagonized this relaxant effect43, 44. However, recent studies carried out in humans, in umbilical veins in vitro10 or in the forearm in vivo45, showed that vasorelaxation to ISO is abolished by the selective β2AR antagonist ICI-118551 and remains unchanged in the presence of the β1AR antagonist CGP-20712, indicating that, as in the vascular smooth muscle cells 46, the endothelial βAR are totally or at least predominantly of the β2 subtype 10, 45. β2AR are seven transmembrane receptors coupled through Gs proteins to a cAMP dependent intracellular pathway47. It has been demonstrated that PKA posphorylation of the third intracellular loop of the β2AR increases the affinity of the receptor for Gi protein48, 49. This switch leads to two consequences: first, it decreases the rate of cAMP generation, since Gi activation inhibits adenylyl cyclase activity. Second, it increases non cAMP dependent signaling through Gi, such as activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases ERK1/2 and PI3K50–54. Gi coupled receptors have been shown to regulate non-receptor tyrosine kinases, such as SRC, which acts as an intermediate between Gi and other molecules like RAS and PI3K 53, 55.

β2AR and Nitric oxide

For years it has been given for granted that vascular β2AR mediate adrenergic vasorelaxation through direct activation of vascular smooth muscle cells56. However, recent data challenge this vision, and show that β2AR-dependent vasorelaxation is mediated at least in part, by endothelium through nitric oxide (NO) dependent processes10. We have recently demonstrated that the β2AR are expressed on endothelial cells (EC) and their stimulation causes endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation57. In particular, β2AR couple to eNOS and induce NO dependent vasodilation 57. The mechanism of eNOS activation following β2AR stimulation is known to be AKT dependent58. Indeed, the activity of eNOS is regulated by both a calcium/calmodulin dependent fashion59 and AKT dependent eNOS phosphorylation in Ser 1177 8, 60–63. AKT is primarily activated in response to stimulation of transmembrane receptors with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity or indirectly coupled to tyrosine kinases or to seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor11, 61, 64. Therefore AKT acts as integrator of different signal transduction pathways converging on eNOS, including endothelial β2AR receptor9, 58, 62, 63, 65.

β2AR and angiogenesis

In the endothelium βARs control other important endothelial functions like angiogenesis, that is tightly associated to endothelial cell migration and proliferation 57, 65, 66. We demonstrated that β2AR stimulation with ISO and the overexpression of β2AR increases endothelial cell proliferation. Moreover, β2AR stimulation induces ERK phosphorylation and the MEKK inhibitor, U0126, inhibits β2AR induced cell proliferation 66 suggesting that β2AR dependent cell proliferation is dependent on ERK activation. We studied post-ischaemic angiogenesis in the hindlimb (HL) of β2AR knock-out mice (β2AR−/−) in vivo and explored possible molecular mechanisms in vitro. Angiogenesis was severely impaired in β2AR−/− mice subjected to femoral artery resection, but was restored by gene therapy with ADβ2AR. The proangiogenic responses to a variety of stimuli were impaired in β2AR−/− EC in vitro17. Moreover, removal of β2ARs impaired the activation of NFκB, a transcription factor that promotes angiogenesis; ISO did not induce NFκB activation in β2AR(−/−) EC17. ADβp2AR administration restored β2AR membrane density and reinstated the NFκB response to ISO 17. These results suggest that β2ARs control angiogenesis through the tight regulation of nuclear transcriptional activity.

α1ARand β2AR differently regulate neo-angiogenesis

α1- and β2-adrenergic receptors mediate opposite effects on neo-angiogenesis, comparable to their regulation of the vascular tone. In particular, the α1-AR is inhibitory, whereas the β2-AR is stimulant to neo-angiogenesis. Interestingly, in ischaemia, the α1-AR are upregulated, thus causing a predominance of α1-adrenergic receptor signalling over that of β2-AR, which is downregulated. Furthermore, in conditions such as hypertension, where the α1-AR tone is higher than that of the β2-AR, there is also an impairment in neo-angiogenesis 66, 67. It is interesting to note that in the ischaemic hindlimb, α1-AR blockade resulted in a normalization of β2-AR density together with improved neo-angiogenesis. α1-AR upregulation, in particular, might be a regulatory mechanism aimed at preventing excessive angiogenesis. This upregulation might be triggered by ischaemia, through regulatory sequences within the gene promoter, which have been demonstrated for both the α1A- and α1B-adrenergic receptor68, 69.

β3 adrenergic receptors

In rat thoracic aorta, Trochu showed that β3AR are mainly located on endothelial cells and act in conjunction with β1AR and β2AR to mediate relaxation through activation of NO synthase pathway and subsequent increase in tissue cyclic GMP content and is reduced by endothelium removal or in presence of L-NMMA 70. This β3AR mediated aorta relaxation seems to be independent of Gi proteins stimulation, since the blockage of Gi protein by PTX does not modify β3AR agonists induced relaxation. On the contrary, selective potassium channels blockers of K (Ca), K (ATP) and K (v) decreased β3AR agonists induced relaxation. So it appears that this effect results from the activation of several potassium channels, K (Ca), K (ATP) and K (v) 71.

Pathological implications

It was reported that noradrenaline-induced release of nitric oxide is enhanced in mineralcorticoid hypertension 72 indicating that α2AR may play an important role in the regulation of vascular tone not only in physiological but also in pathological conditions. The implications of impaired βAR signalling in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular disorders has been studied in animals and humans. Data from these studies indicate that changes in βAR function are induced by heart failure 73, 74 and hypertension 75, 76. Moreover, alteration in βAR function were found also with physiological aging 77, 78, due to receptor downregulation and desensitization. Exercise restored the impaired signalling and βAR dependent vasorelaxation79. We and others have observed that impaired βAR signalling may account for dysfunctional βAR vasorelaxation in hypertension. In this condition, β2AR overexpression in hypertensive rat carotids corrects impaired vasorelaxation to βAR stimulation to levels similar to those seen in normotensive rats57. We proved that impaired endothelium dependent vasorelaxation in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) can be corrected by increasing the signal transduction pathways leading to nitric oxide synthase activation 80. In particular, since eNOS is activated in response to phosphorylation by AKT and impaired AKT activity is involved in endothelial dysfunction, AKT overexpression should result in the correction of impaired phenotype. Indeed, insulin and ISO cause AKT membrane localization and this subcellular localization is impaired in SHR. AKT overexpression, through means of adenovirus mediated AKT gene transfer to the endothelium, increases the amount of AKT localized to the membrane and corrects impaired NO release and endothelium dependent vasodilation to agonists of both the GPCR and tyrosine kinase (TK) dependent pathways.

Conclusions

In the last years great advances have been made in the study of adrenergic receptors signaling and function in the endothelium also thanks to the development of new technologies. Indeed, genetic mouse models have significantly improved our understanding of the mechanisms of action of specific drugs in vivo. The ability to induce transgene expression at defined times or in defined tissues is an important goal as well as the ability to induce or repress the expression of endogenous genes in a developmental or tissue specific fashion. Indeed, deletion of the genes encoding for adrenergic receptor subtypeshas helped to identify the specific subtypes whichmediate in vivo effects of specific drugs. Thus, the combination of molecular biological, genetic, and pharmacological techniques greatly facilitates our understanding of adrenergic receptor function in vivo, and in turn leads to more effective and specific therapeutic treatment in humans. βARs, for instance, are already target of therapeutic intervention in many diseases: βAR stimulation in asthma and obesity or βAR blocking in hypertension and coronary insufficiency. In conclusion, giving the importance of endothelial function in most physiological and pathological conditions, it is clear that the increasing knowledge of adrenergic receptors function in the endothelium is helpful for future progresses in clinical application.
  80 in total

1.  Cloning of the gene and cDNA for mammalian beta-adrenergic receptor and homology with rhodopsin.

Authors:  R A Dixon; B K Kobilka; D J Strader; J L Benovic; H G Dohlman; T Frielle; M A Bolanowski; C D Bennett; E Rands; R E Diehl; R A Mumford; E E Slater; I S Sigal; M G Caron; R J Lefkowitz; C D Strader
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 May 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effects of inhibition of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway on vasodilation caused by beta-adrenergic agonists in human forearm.

Authors:  M Dawes; P J Chowienczyk; J M Ritter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Functional coupling of the beta 2-adrenoceptor to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein in cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R P Xiao; X Ji; E G Lakatta
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Src tyrosine kinase is a novel direct effector of G proteins.

Authors:  Y C Ma; J Huang; S Ali; W Lowry; X Y Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Beta-adrenergic receptor binding characteristics and responsiveness in cultured Wistar-Kyoto rat arterial smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  A Jazayeri; W J Meyer
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Beta 3-adrenoceptor in rat aorta: molecular and biochemical characterization and signalling pathway.

Authors:  Yohann Rautureau; Gilles Toumaniantz; Sabrina Serpillon; Philippe Jourdon; Jean-Noël Trochu; Chantal Gauthier
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Involvement of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in endothelial NO production and endothelium-dependent relaxation.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Schneider; Driss El Kebir; Christiane Chéreau; Sophie Lanone; Xiao-Lin Huang; Anthony S De Buys Roessingh; Jean-Christophe Mercier; Josette Dall'Ava-Santucci; A Tuan Dinh-Xuan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction.

Authors:  B M Burgering; P J Coffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Loss of endothelial pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein function in atherosclerotic porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  H Shimokawa; N A Flavahan; P M Vanhoutte
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Insulin stimulates the kinase activity of RAC-PK, a pleckstrin homology domain containing ser/thr kinase.

Authors:  A D Kohn; K S Kovacina; R A Roth
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Vascular phenotype of amyloid precursor protein-deficient mice.

Authors:  Livius V d'Uscio; Zvonimir S Katusic
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Task-related hemodynamic responses in human early visual cortex are modulated by task difficulty and behavioral performance.

Authors:  Charlie S Burlingham; Minyoung Ryoo; Zvi N Roth; Saghar Mirbagheri; David J Heeger; Elisha P Merriam
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Angiogenesis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a translational appraisal.

Authors:  Alessandro Matarese; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Effects of Caffeic Acid and Its Derivatives: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Henrique Silva; Nuno Miguel F Lopes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Effects of physical activity on endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).

Authors:  Chiara De Biase; Roberta De Rosa; Rossella Luciano; Stefania De Luca; Ernesto Capuano; Bruno Trimarco; Gennaro Galasso
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Autonomic Receptors and Nitric-Oxide Involvements in Mediating Vasorelaxation Effect Induced by Syzygium polyanthum Leaves Extract.

Authors:  Azlini Ismail; Wan Amir Nizam Wan Ahmad
Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res       Date:  2017-12

7.  Beta-adrenergic receptors are expressed across diverse cancers.

Authors:  Steven L Rains; Clarissa N Amaya; Brad A Bryan
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 8.  The Antioxidant Therapy: New Insights in the Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Daniela Sorriento; Nicola De Luca; Bruno Trimarco; Guido Iaccarino
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Intermittent Hypoxia-Induced Activation of Endothelial Cells Is Mediated via Sympathetic Activation-Dependent Catecholamine Release.

Authors:  Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Angelo Y Meliton; David Wu; Parker S Woods; Kaitlyn A Sun; Ying-Jie Peng; Jayasri Nanduri; Xiaoyu Su; Yun Fang; Robert B Hamanaka; Nanduri Prabhakar; Gökhan M Mutlu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.755

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.