| Literature DB >> 23904831 |
Alexandra Schönherr1, Viktoria Aivazova-Fuchs, Katja Annecke, Julia Jückstock, Philip Hepp, Ulrich Andergassen, Doris Augustin, Wolfgang Simon, Arthur Wischnik, Svjetlana Mohrmann, Jessica Salmen, Thomas Zwingers, Marion Kiechle, Nadja Harbeck, Klaus Friese, Wolfgang Janni, Brigitte Rack.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data from meta-analyses have shown taxane-containing therapies to be superior to anthracycline-based treatments for high-risk breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ADEBAR trial was a multicenter phase III trial in which patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer were prospectively randomized for either sequential anthracycline-taxane or FEC120 therapy. Patients received 4× epirubicin (90 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks (q3w), followed by 4× docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) q3w (EC-Doc arm), or 6× epirubicin (60 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide (75 mg/m(2)) on days 1-14, q4w (FEC arm). We compared both arms with respect to toxicity and feasibility.Entities:
Keywords: ADEBAR trial; Anthracycline; Breast cancer; Taxane; Toxicity
Year: 2012 PMID: 23904831 PMCID: PMC3515794 DOI: 10.1159/000341384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Care (Basel) ISSN: 1661-3791 Impact factor: 2.860