BACKGROUND: Serum lactate dehydrogenase is a non-specific marker for lymphoma whose prognostic significance is well established for both indolent and aggressive lymphomas at the time of diagnosis. The performance characteristics of this enzyme in predicting relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has not been well studied. METHODS: This study compared serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in 27 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who relapsed after sustaining a complete response versus 87 patients who did not relapse. For relapsed patients, the serum lactate dehydrogenase level at relapse was compared with the level three months before (considered baseline). For non-relapsed patients, the last two levels during follow-up were compared. For statistical analysis the T-test was used to compare differences in mean values between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for serum lactate dehydrogenase in detecting relapse compared to confirmatory imaging were calculated. RESULTS: At relapse, only 33% patients had increases in serum lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal. The mean increase was 1.2-fold above the upper limit of normal for relapsed vs. 0.83 for those who did not relapse (p-value = 0.59). The mean increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase, from baseline, was 1.1-fold in non-relapsed vs. 1.3 in relapsed patients (p-value = 0.3). The likelihood ratio of relapse was 4.65 for patients who had 1.5-fold increases in serum lactate dehydrogenase above baseline (p-value = 0.03). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 1.5-fold increases for detecting relapse, compared to clinical and imaging findings were 0.18, 0.95, 0.55, and 0.79, respectively. CONCLUSION: A 1.5-fold increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase, over a period of 3 months, is associated with increased likelihood of relapse from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
BACKGROUND: Serum lactate dehydrogenase is a non-specific marker for lymphoma whose prognostic significance is well established for both indolent and aggressive lymphomas at the time of diagnosis. The performance characteristics of this enzyme in predicting relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has not been well studied. METHODS: This study compared serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in 27 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who relapsed after sustaining a complete response versus 87 patients who did not relapse. For relapsed patients, the serum lactate dehydrogenase level at relapse was compared with the level three months before (considered baseline). For non-relapsed patients, the last two levels during follow-up were compared. For statistical analysis the T-test was used to compare differences in mean values between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for serum lactate dehydrogenase in detecting relapse compared to confirmatory imaging were calculated. RESULTS: At relapse, only 33% patients had increases in serum lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal. The mean increase was 1.2-fold above the upper limit of normal for relapsed vs. 0.83 for those who did not relapse (p-value = 0.59). The mean increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase, from baseline, was 1.1-fold in non-relapsed vs. 1.3 in relapsed patients (p-value = 0.3). The likelihood ratio of relapse was 4.65 for patients who had 1.5-fold increases in serum lactate dehydrogenase above baseline (p-value = 0.03). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 1.5-fold increases for detecting relapse, compared to clinical and imaging findings were 0.18, 0.95, 0.55, and 0.79, respectively. CONCLUSION: A 1.5-fold increase in serum lactate dehydrogenase, over a period of 3 months, is associated with increased likelihood of relapse from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Authors: N Tomita; F Kodama; R Sakai; H Koharasawa; M Hattori; J Taguchi; H Fujita; J Tanabe; S Fujisawa; H Fukawa; H Harano; H Kanamori; H Miyashita; M Matsuzaki; K Ogawa; S Motomura; A Maruta; Y Ishigatsubo Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2000-07
Authors: C Nicolaides; G Fountzilas; N Zoumbos; D Skarlos; P Kosmidis; D Pectasides; A Karabelis; T Giannakakis; A Symeonidis; A Papadopoulos; F Antoniou; N Pavlidis Journal: Oncology Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Christian Gisselbrecht; Bertram Glass; Nicolas Mounier; Devinder Singh Gill; David C Linch; Marek Trneny; Andre Bosly; Nicolas Ketterer; Ofer Shpilberg; Hans Hagberg; David Ma; Josette Brière; Craig H Moskowitz; Norbert Schmitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Tallarico; Jared C Foster; Drew Seisler; Jacqueline M Lafky; Arti Hurria; Aminah Jatoi; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss; Nancy Bartlett; Bruce D Cheson; Sin-Ho Jung; John P Leonard; John C Byrd; Chadi Nabhan Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Florian Scherer; David M Kurtz; Aaron M Newman; Henning Stehr; Alexander F M Craig; Mohammad Shahrokh Esfahani; Alexander F Lovejoy; Jacob J Chabon; Daniel M Klass; Chih Long Liu; Li Zhou; Cynthia Glover; Brendan C Visser; George A Poultsides; Ranjana H Advani; Lauren S Maeda; Neel K Gupta; Ronald Levy; Robert S Ohgami; Christian A Kunder; Maximilian Diehn; Ash A Alizadeh Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 17.956