Literature DB >> 23904720

Revisional surgery after heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia: a comparative analysis focusing on operative approach.

Biswanath P Gouda1, Thomas Nelson, Sunil Bhoyrul.   

Abstract

Surgical myotomy is the gold standard in therapy for achalasia, but treatment failures occur and require revisional surgery. A MEDLINE search of peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1970 to December 2008 was performed using the following terms: esophageal achalasia, Heller myotomy, and revisional surgery. Thirty-three articles satisfied our inclusion criteria. A total of 12,727 patients, with mean age of 43.3 years (males 46% and females 50%), underwent Heller myotomy (open 94.8% and laparoscopic 5.2%). Revisional surgery was performed in 6.19%. Procedures performed included revision of the original myotomy or creation of a new myotomy with or without an antireflux procedure or esophagectomy. Reasons for reoperation were incomplete myotomy (51.8%), onset of reflux (34%), megaesophagus (16.2%), and esophageal carcinoma (3.04%). Systematic review of the literature for revisional surgery following Heller myotomy revealed a 6.19% rate of reoperation with a low mortality rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Heller myotomy; Revisional surgery

Year:  2012        PMID: 23904720      PMCID: PMC3444613          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-011-0402-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  39 in total

1.  The laparoscopic reoperation of failed Heller myotomy.

Authors:  P E Duffy; Z T Awad; C J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical management of failed esophagomyotomy (Heller's operation).

Authors:  B Gayet; F Fékété
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1991-12

3.  Achalasia of the esophagus in a small urban community.

Authors:  R J Earlam; F H Ellis; F T Nobrega
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Reoperation for achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  D L Patrick; W S Payne; A M Olsen; F H Ellis
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1971-08

5.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  J D Luketich; H C Fernando; N A Christie; P O Buenaventura; R J Keenan; S Ikramuddin; P R Schauer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Management of failed Heller's operations.

Authors:  J Kiss; A Vörös; E Szirányi; A Altorjay; A Bohák
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; E W Cameron; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Reoperative achalasia surgery.

Authors:  F H Ellis; R E Crozier; S P Gibb
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Failure after esophagomyotomy for esophageal motor disorders. Causes, prevention, and management.

Authors:  F H Ellis
Journal:  Chest Surg Clin N Am       Date:  1997-08

10.  Reoperation after failed esophagomyotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  C D Mercer; L D Hill
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What to do when Heller's myotomy fails? Pneumatic dilatation, laparoscopic remyotomy or peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sonia Fernandez-Ananin; Arnulfo F Fernández; Carmen Balagué; David Sacoto; Eduardo Maria Targarona
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.