Literature DB >> 23904700

A Comparative Study of Gravidogram and Ultrasound in Detection of IUGR.

Priya Pillay1, S Janaki, Cecy Manjila.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to compare the gravidogram and ultrasound in the detection of intrauterine growth restriction.
METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Voluntary Health Services, Chennai (TN) from August 2007-May 2009. The study included 321 women with singleton pregnancy in a longitudinal lie. These women underwent serial symphysio-fundal height measurements and ultrasound. Birth weights of the newborns were noted at the time of delivery. Gravidogram and ultrasound findings were correlated with the birth weights.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the ultrasound in the detection of IUGR was higher (85.2 vs 74.1 %) than the gravidogram, but the specificity was almost the same (96.6 and 95.9 %).
CONCLUSIONS: The gravidogram is a simple and inexpensive screening tool and as useful as an ultrasound in detection of intrauterine growth restriction. Both gravidogram and ultrasound, when used together, have higher detection rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gravidogram; Intrauterine growth restriction; Ultrasound

Year:  2012        PMID: 23904700      PMCID: PMC3500952          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0292-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and maternal determinants of small-for-gestational age births: patterns of increasing disparity.

Authors:  John R Beard; Doug Lincoln; Deborah Donoghue; Danielle Taylor; Richard Summerhayes; Therese M Dunn; Arul Earnest; Geoff Morgan
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Umbilical artery doppler screening for detection of the small fetus in need of antepartum surveillance.

Authors:  A A Baschat; C P Weiner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A comparison of symphysis-fundal height and ultrasound as screening tests for light-for-gestational age infants.

Authors:  J M Pearce; S Campbell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-02

4.  The association of primiparity with intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  I Shoham-Vardi; J R Leiberman; G Kopernik
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Gravidogram and fetal growth. Comparison with biochemical supervision.

Authors:  B Westin
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  [Intrauterine growth restriction and pregnancy outcome].

Authors:  L Driul; A P Londero; M Della Martina; C Papadakis; C Campana; D Pontello; A Citossi; D Marchesoni
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2008-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.