Literature DB >> 23904532

The ethics of wildlife research: a nine R theory.

Howard J Curzer, Mark C Wallace, Gad Perry, Peter J Muhlberger, Dan Perry.   

Abstract

The commonsense ethical constraints on laboratory animal research known as the three Rs are widely accepted, but no constraints tailored to research on animals in the wild are available. In this article, we begin to fill that gap. We sketch a set of commonsense ethical constraints on ecosystem research parallel to the constraints that govern laboratory animal research. Then we combine the animal and ecosystem constraints into a single theory to govern research on animals in the wild.

Keywords:  ecosystem; ethics; reduction; refinement; replacement; three Rs; wildlife research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23904532     DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilt012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  4 in total

1.  The Three Rs of Animal Research: What they Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Why.

Authors:  Howard J Curzer; Gad Perry; Mark C Wallace; Dan Perry
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm.

Authors:  Kate A Field; Paul C Paquet; Kyle Artelle; Gilbert Proulx; Ryan K Brook; Chris T Darimont
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Food and nutrition of Gaur (Bos gaurus C.H. Smith, 1827) at the edge of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand.

Authors:  Rattanawat Chaiyarat; Suphat Prasopsin; Naris Bhumpakphan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Out of the laboratory, into the field: perspectives on social, ethical and regulatory challenges in UK wildlife research.

Authors:  Alexandra Palmer; Beth Greenhough
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.237

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.