Literature DB >> 23904248

CORR Insights ®: Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?

Vance W Berger1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23904248      PMCID： PMC3792239          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-013-3203-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Making statistics boring again.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Intent-to-treat: further insight.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials?

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

5.  Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; Azadeh Rezvani; Vanessa A Makarewicz
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2003-04

6.  The scandal of poor medical research.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

7.  Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Has the Level of Evidence of Podium Presentations at the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Annual Meeting Changed Over Time?

Authors:  Daniel M Lerman; Matthew G Cable; Patrick Thornley; Nathan Evaniew; Gerard P Slobogean; Mohit Bhandari; John H Healey; R Lor Randall; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.