| Literature DB >> 23903966 |
Nilton Ghiotti de Siqueira1, Cláudia Maria Villar Maziero de Siqueira, Rosângela Rodrigues-Silva, Manoel do Carmo P Soares, Marinete Marins Póvoa.
Abstract
The lack of knowledge regarding polycystic hydatid disease results in delayed or even incorrect diagnosis. The lack of systematic information regarding treatment also makes it difficult to assess the results and prognosis in patients with peritoneal and hepatic lesions caused by Echinococcus vogeli. Here we describe the clinical features of patients, propose a radiological classification protocol and describe a therapeutic option for the treatment of hydatid disease that previously had only been used for cases of cystic echinococcosis (Echinococcus granulosus). A prospective cohort study was initiated in 1999 and by 2009 the study included 60 patients. These patients were classified according to the PNM classification (parasite lesion, neighbouring organ invasion and metastases) and placed in one of three therapeutic modalities: (i) chemotherapy with albendazole at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day, (ii) surgical removal of cysts or (iii) percutaneous puncture of the cysts via puncture, aspiration, injection and re-aspiration (PAIR). The results were stratified according to therapeutic outcome: "cure", "clinical improvement", "no improvement", "death" or "no information". The PNM classification was useful in indicating the appropriate therapy in cases of polycystic hydatid disease. In conclusion, surgical therapy produced the best clinical results of all the therapies studied based on "cure" and "clinical improvement" outcomes. The use of PAIR for treatment requires additional study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23903966 PMCID: PMC3970588 DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762013000500001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Fig. 1patients diagnosed with polycystic hydatid disease based on year of enrollment in the study during the period from 1999-2009.
Distribution of cases of polycystic echinococcosis according to the patients' PNM classification, age and gender who were treated at Hospital Foundation of Acre during the period from 1999-2009
| Gender (n) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | Female | Male | Total n (%) | ||
| I | Age (years) | 21-30 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 31-40 | 1 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 41-50 | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||
| 51-60 | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||
| 61-70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total | - | 4 | 14 | 18 (31) | |
| II | Age (years) | 41-50 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 61-70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total | - | 0 | 2 | 2 (3.44) | |
| IIIa | Age (years) | 41-50 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | - | 0 | 1 | 1 (1.72) | |
| IIIb | Age (years) | 11-20 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 21-30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||
| 31-40 | 5 | 2 | 7 | ||
| 41-50 | 0 | 5 | 5 | ||
| 51-60 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 61-70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 71-80 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 81-90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Total | - | 12 | 12 | 24 (41.37) | |
| IV | Age (years) | 21-30 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 31-40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 41-50 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 51-60 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 61-70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 71-80 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Total | - | 3 | 3 | 6 (10.34) | |
| Mesenteric | Age (years) | 0-10 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 11-20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 21-30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 31-40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 41-50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 51-60 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total | - | 3 | 3 | 6 (10.34) | |
| Retroperitoneum | Age (years) | 41-50 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | - | 1 | 0 | 1 (1.72) | |
| Total a | - | - | 23 | 35 | 58 (100) |
a : 58 because there was an error in the epidemiological form data annotation in two cases; PNM: parasite lesion, neighbouring organ invasion, metastases.
Main signs and symptoms shown by patients with polycystic echinococcosis included in the study, Rio Branco, state of Acre, 1999-2009
| Signs and symptoms | (n) | (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Upper abdominal pain | 39/60 | 65 |
| Palpable liver | 33/55 | 60 |
| Jaundice | 10/57 | 17.5 |
| Extrahepatic mass (es) | 7/55 | 12.7 |
| Oedema | 5/54 | 9.3 |
| Ascites | 4/55 | 7.4 |
| Backache | 4/60 | 6.7 |
| Collateral circulation | 3/55 | 5.5 |
Relationship between disease stage, type of treatment and outcome in participating patients, 1999-2009
| Albendazole | Surgery | PAIR a | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | D | C | CI | NI | ND | D | C | CI | NI | ND | D | C | CI | NI | ND | (n) |
| Stage | ||||||||||||||||
| I | - | - | 4 | - | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | - | - | - | (1) | 2 | - | - | 18 |
| II | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
| IIIa | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| IIIb | 3 | - | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | - | 1 | (1) + 2 | (1) + 1 | - | - | - | 24 |
| IV | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | (1) | - | - | 6 |
| Mesenteric | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
| Retroperitoneal | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Sub-totals | 4 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 17 | 4 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
| Total | 28 | 25 | 5 | 58 | ||||||||||||
a : although percutaneous punctures were performed in nine patients, we could only consider the treatment through puncture, aspiration, injection and re-aspiration (PAIR) in five. The other four patients (numbers between brackets) underwent more than one procedure and therefore were not considered. C: cure; CI: clinical improvement; D: death; ND: no data; NI: no improvement.
Duration of follow-up for patients with polycystic echinococcosis included in the study, Rio Branco, state of Acre, 1999-2009
| Follow-up (days) | Albendazole (n = 29) | Surgery (n = 26) | PAIR (n = 5) | Total (n = 60) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 771.07 | 761.85 | 638.40 | 884.25 |
| Median | 431.00 | 267.50 | 163.00 | 431.00 |
| Standard deviation | 876.13 | 1.121.96 | 1.144.56 | 1.001.81 |
| Minimum | 0 a | 0 a | 39 | 0 a |
| Maximum | 3.065 | 3.755 | 2.683 | 3.755 |
a : patients who did not return to the outpatient clinic for reevaluations or who died during hospitalisation.
PNM Human Alveolar Echinococcosis Classification System
| Parasite liver location (P) | |
|---|---|
| PX | Primary lesion cannot be assessed |
| P0 | Non-detectable liver lesion |
| P1 | Peripheral lesion without vascular and/or biliary involvement |
| P2 | Central lesion with
vascular and/or biliary involvement of one lobe |
| P3 | Central lesion with vascular and/or biliary involvement of both lobes or with involvement of two hepatic veins |
| P4 | Any liver lesion
with extension along blood vessels |
| Extrahepatic involvement of neighbouring organs (N) (diaphragm, lung, pleura, pericardium, heart, gastric or duodenal walls, adrenal glands, peritoneum, retroperitoneum, abdominal wall (muscles, skin, bones), pancreas, regional lymph nodes, hepatic ligaments or kidneys) | |
| NX | Not evaluable |
| N0 | Without regional involvement |
| N1 | Regional involvement of neighbouring organs or tissues |
| Absence or presence of distant metastases (M) (lung, distant lymph nodes, spleen, central nervous system, orbit, bones, skin, muscle, distant sites from the peritoneum or retroperitoneum) | |
| MX | Not evaluable |
| M0 | Without metastases |
| M1 | Metastases |
a: for classification, the plane projected between the gallbladder bed and inferior vena cava divides the liver into two lobes; b: vessels refer to inferior the vena cava, portal vein and arteries; c: negative lung X-rays and computed tomography of the brain. Source: adapted from Kern et al. (2006).
Staging based on PNM Human Alveolar Echinococcosis Classification System
| Stage I | P1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage II | P2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIa | P3 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage IIIb | P1-3 | N1 | M0 |
| P4 | N0 | M0 | |
| Stage IV | P4 | N1 | M0 |
| any P | any N and/or | M1 |
source: adapted from Kern et al. (2006).