BACKGROUND: Cognitive consequences at school age associated with prenatal methylmercury (MeHg) exposure may need to take into account nutritional and sociodemographic cofactors as well as relevant genetic polymorphisms. METHODS: A subsample (n = 1,311) of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (Bristol, UK) was selected, and mercury (Hg) concentrations were measured in freeze-dried umbilical cord tissue as a measure of MeHg exposure. A total of 1135 children had available data on 247 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within relevant genes, as well as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores at age 8 years. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the associations between MeHg exposure and IQ and to determine possible gene-environment interactions. RESULTS: Hg concentrations indicated low background exposures (mean = 26 ng/g, standard deviation = 13). Log10-transformed Hg was positively associated with IQ, which attenuated after adjustment for nutritional and sociodemographic cofactors. In stratified analyses, a reverse association was found in higher social class families (for performance IQ, P value for interaction = 0.0013) among whom there was a wider range of MeHg exposure. Among 40 SNPs showing nominally significant main effects, MeHg interactions were detected for rs662 (paraoxonase 1) and rs1042838 (progesterone receptor) (P < 0.05) and for rs3811647 (transferrin) and rs2049046 (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) (P < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In this population with a low level of MeHg exposure, there were only equivocal associations between MeHg exposure and adverse neuropsychological outcomes. Heterogeneities in several relevant genes suggest possible genetic predisposition to MeHg neurotoxicity in a substantial proportion of the population. Future studies need to address this possibility.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive consequences at school age associated with prenatal methylmercury (MeHg) exposure may need to take into account nutritional and sociodemographic cofactors as well as relevant genetic polymorphisms. METHODS: A subsample (n = 1,311) of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (Bristol, UK) was selected, and mercury (Hg) concentrations were measured in freeze-dried umbilical cord tissue as a measure of MeHg exposure. A total of 1135 children had available data on 247 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within relevant genes, as well as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores at age 8 years. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the associations between MeHg exposure and IQ and to determine possible gene-environment interactions. RESULTS: Hg concentrations indicated low background exposures (mean = 26 ng/g, standard deviation = 13). Log10-transformed Hg was positively associated with IQ, which attenuated after adjustment for nutritional and sociodemographic cofactors. In stratified analyses, a reverse association was found in higher social class families (for performance IQ, P value for interaction = 0.0013) among whom there was a wider range of MeHg exposure. Among 40 SNPs showing nominally significant main effects, MeHg interactions were detected for rs662 (paraoxonase 1) and rs1042838 (progesterone receptor) (P < 0.05) and for rs3811647 (transferrin) and rs2049046 (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) (P < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In this population with a low level of MeHg exposure, there were only equivocal associations between MeHg exposure and adverse neuropsychological outcomes. Heterogeneities in several relevant genes suggest possible genetic predisposition to MeHg neurotoxicity in a substantial proportion of the population. Future studies need to address this possibility.
Authors: Jonghun Lee; Nancy Laurin; Jennifer Crosbie; Abel Ickowicz; Tejaswee Pathare; Molly Malone; Rosemary Tannock; James L Kennedy; Russell Schachar; Cathy L Barr Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2007-12-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Paul W Stewart; Jacqueline Reihman; Edward I Lonky; Thomas J Darvill; James Pagano Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Edwin van Wijngaarden; Sally W Thurston; Gary J Myers; Donald Harrington; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; J J Strain; Gene E Watson; Grazyna Zareba; Tanzy Love; Juliette Henderson; Conrad F Shamlaye; Philip W Davidson Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Vasco Branco; Sam Caito; Marcelo Farina; João Teixeira da Rocha; Michael Aschner; Cristina Carvalho Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Li-Shan Huang; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Christopher Cox; Sally W Thurston; Conrad F Shamlaye; Gene E Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Grazyna Zareba; J J Strain; Gary J Myers; Philip W Davidson Journal: Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 3.379
Authors: Sara L Montgomery; Daria Vorojeikina; Wen Huang; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt; Matthew D Rand Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240