Literature DB >> 23903676

Parental perceptions of clinical research in the pediatric emergency department.

Lucy E Abernethy1, Elizabeth L Paulsen, Michael C Monuteaux, Mark P Berry, Mark I Neuman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information about parental perceptions of clinical research in children, particularly in the emergency department (ED) setting.
METHODS: Parents accompanying their child to the ED completed a self-administered survey gauging perceptions of research and willingness to enroll a child in a clinical research study. Factor analysis was used to correlate survey responses into domains representing parents' feeling about participation in a research study. Logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of caregivers' amenability to research participation for their child.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-eight parents were enrolled. Most subjects were willing to enroll their child in a study involving follow-up after ED care (87%) and collection of a urine or saliva sample (79% and 81%, respectively) and extant blood (69%). Fewer were amenable to studies that involve an investigational medication (26%) or additional phlebotomy (27%). Overall, more than 90% of parents felt that research was needed to help other children and was conducted in a way that is morally right, and 25% felt that research may compromise their child's confidentiality. Factor analyses yielded 3 factors that accounted for the variance across the survey questions. Patient and parent demographics, including the patient's triage acuity level, were not associated with willingness to participate in research.
CONCLUSIONS: Most parents are amenable to having their child participate in a research study in the ED setting. Most parents share a sense of altruism that research is needed to help children, and this belief is predictive of willingness to participate in a research study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23903676     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31829e7f47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  3 in total

1.  The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Jane Welch; Rachel Lally; Jennifer E Miller; Stephanie Pittman; Lynda Brodsky; Arthur L Caplan; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Darcy M Louzao; James H Fischer; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Paediatric patient family engagement with clinical research at a tertiary care paediatric hospital.

Authors:  Carson Gill; Mark J Ansermino; Shubhayan Sanatani; Kishore Mulpuri; Quynh Doan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Ethics of research in pediatric emergency medicine.

Authors:  Gal Neuman; Itay Shavit; Doreen Matsui; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.