Literature DB >> 23903392

Geospatial analytics to evaluate point-of-dispensing sites for mass immunizations in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

Kibri H Everett1, Margaret A Potter, William D Wheaton, Sherrianne M Gleason, Shawn T Brown, Bruce Y Lee.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Public health agencies use mass immunization locations to quickly administer vaccines to protect a population against an epidemic. The selection of such locations is frequently determined by available staffing levels and in some places, not all potential sites can be opened, often because of a lack of resources. Public health agencies need assistance in determining which n sites are the prime ones to open given available staff to minimize travel time and travel distance for those in the population who need to get to a site to receive treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Employ geospatial analytical methods to identify the prime n locations from a predetermined set of potential locations (eg, schools) and determine which locations may not be able to achieve the throughput necessary to reach the herd immunity threshold based on varying R0 values.
DESIGN: Spatial location-allocation algorithms were used to select the ideal n mass vaccination locations.
SETTING: Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, served as the study area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The most favorable sites were selected and the number of individuals required to be vaccinated to achieve the herd immunity threshold for a given R0, ranging from 1.5 to 7, was determined. Locations that did not meet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention throughput recommendation for smallpox were identified.
RESULTS: At R0 = 1.5, all mass immunization locations met the required throughput to achieve the herd immunity threshold within 5 days. As R0s increased from 2 to 7, an increasing number of sites were inadequate to meet throughput requirements.
CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the top n sites and categorizing those with throughput challenges allows health departments to adjust staffing, shift length, or the number of sites. This method has the potential to be expanded to select immunization locations under a number of additional scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23903392      PMCID: PMC3808194          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182941a5a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  4 in total

1.  Synthesized Population Databases: A US Geospatial Database for Agent-Based Models.

Authors:  William D Wheaton; James C Cajka; Bernadette M Chasteen; Diane K Wagener; Philip C Cooley; Laxminarayana Ganapathi; Douglas J Roberts; Justine L Allpress
Journal:  Methods Rep RTI Press       Date:  2009-05-01

2.  Developing national standards for public health emergency preparedness with a limited evidence base.

Authors:  Christopher Nelson; Ed Chan; Anita Chandra; Paul Sorensen; Henry H Willis; Stephanie Dulin; Kristin Leuschner
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.385

3.  A computer simulation of vaccine prioritization, allocation, and rationing during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; George W Korch; Philip C Cooley; Richard K Zimmerman; William D Wheaton; Shanta M Zimmer; John J Grefenstette; Rachel R Bailey; Tina-Marie Assi; Donald S Burke
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  The benefits to all of ensuring equal and timely access to influenza vaccines in poor communities.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; Rachel R Bailey; Richard K Zimmerman; Margaret A Potter; Sarah M McGlone; Philip C Cooley; John J Grefenstette; Shanta M Zimmer; William D Wheaton; Sandra Crouse Quinn; Ronald E Voorhees; Donald S Burke
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.301

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  A data-driven allocation tool for in-kind resources distributed by a state health department.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott R Kegler; Wende R Parker; David Sullivan
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  An assessment of child passenger safety levels of service in Michigan.

Authors:  Michelle L Macy; Shannon J Brines; Acham Gebremariam; Miriam A Manary; Halimat Olaniyan; Kathleen D Klinich
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 1.491

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.