Literature DB >> 23903084

Reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy: outcomes and reconstructive algorithm.

Albert H Chao1, Sara A Neimanis, David W Chang, Valerae O Lewis, Matthew M Hanasono.   

Abstract

Internal hemipelvectomy may be indicated in the treatment of select tumors of the pelvis and lower extremity, and has become our preferred approach due to favorable outcomes. After such extensive resections, which can involve long operative times and significant blood loss, there are often substantial bony and soft tissue deficits. However, it is unclear whether the benefits of reconstruction in these cases outweigh the risks involved. In the largest series to date of internal hemipelvectomy patients, we evaluate the effect of reconstruction on surgical complications, postoperative function, and survival. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy between 1998 and 2011. Outcomes for patients who underwent reconstruction were compared to outcomes for those who did not. A total of 111 patients underwent internal hemipelvectomy, of which 51 (45.9%) received reconstruction and 60 (54.1%) did not. In cases of reconstruction, 30 (58.8%) involved placement of mesh for abdominal wall and pelvic floor reconstruction, 27 (52.9%) involved a soft tissue flap, and 15 (29.4%) involved a vascularized bone flap to restore pelvic ring continuity. Two concurrent reconstructive procedures were performed in 22 (43.1%) patients. The overall rate of early complications was 19.8%, which occurred in 15.7% of patients who received reconstruction compared to 23.3% in patients who did not (P = 0.35). Late recipient-site complications occurred significantly less often in patients who underwent reconstruction (7.8% vs 26.7%, respectively; P = 0.01). From a functional standpoint, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were higher in patients who underwent reconstruction, although this was not statistically significant (62.8% vs 48.4%, respectively; P = 0.12). The 2 groups were similar with regard to operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, as well as overall and disease-free survival rates. Overall, these results indicate that immediate reconstruction of internal hemipelvectomy defects significantly reduces the incidence of late recipient-site complications, without an adverse effect on perioperative course or overall function. An algorithm for reconstruction based on these outcomes is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 23903084     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829778e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  7 in total

Review 1.  Lateral Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sahil K Kapur; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  What are the functional results and complications from allograft reconstruction after partial hemipelvectomy of the pubis?

Authors:  S Mohammed Karim; Matthew W Colman; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón; Kevin A Raskin; Joseph H Schwab; Francis J Hornicek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Epidemiological characteristics of patients with pelvic tumors submitted to surgical treatment.

Authors:  Jairo Greco Garcia; Adriano Martinez; Reynaldo Jesus Garcia Filho; Marcelo Toledo Petrilli; Dan Carai Viola
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-12-06

4.  An Innovative Solution to Complex Inguinal Defect: Deepithelialized SIEA Flap With Mini Abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Augustine Reid Wilson; Justin Daggett; Michael Harrington; Deniz Dayicioglu
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-01-25

5.  Three-dimensional-printed customized prosthesis for pubic defect: prosthesis design and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Yuqi Zhang; Li Min; Minxun Lu; Jie Wang; Yitian Wang; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou; Hong Duan; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Late Distal Ureteral Stricture in Internal Hemipelvectomy Without Bone Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Authors:  Apichat Asavamongkolkul; Ekkarin Chotikawanich
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Case Report: Reconstruction After Anterior Pubic Hemipelvectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin Murphy; Tharsa Thillainadesan; Kerian Robinson; Anita Clarke; Peter Choong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.