| Literature DB >> 23903059 |
Kazuhiro Takimoto1, Motoko Taharaguchi, Koji Sakai, Hirotaka Takagi, Yukinobu Tohya, Yasuko K Yamada.
Abstract
We evaluated the in vitro efficacy of weak acid hypochlorous solution (WAHS) against murine norovirus (MNV) by plaque assay and compared the efficacy with diluted NaOCl (Purelox) and 70% ethanol. WAHS was as effective as 70% ethanol and diluted Purelox for 0.5-min reactions. For 0.5-min reactions in the presence of mouse feces emulsion, the efficacy of WHAS and 1:600 diluted Purelox was decreased, reducing the virus titers by 2.3 and 2.6 log10, respectively, while 70% ethanol reduced the titer by more than 5 log10. However, WAHS showed more than 5 log10 reductions for the 5-min reaction even in the presence of feces emulsion. Since WAHS showed enough efficacy in inactivating MNV in vitro, we tried to eliminate MNV from MNV-infected mice by substituting WAHS for their drinking water. However, MNV was found to be positive in feces of mice drinking WAHS by an RT-nested PCR and plaque assay. To investigate whether hypochlorite-based disinfectants could prevent infection of a mouse with MNV, WAHS or 1:6,000 diluted Purelox was substituted for the drinking water of mice for 2 or 4 weeks, and then the mice were placed in a cage with an MNV-infected mouse. The supply of disinfectants was continued after cohabitation, but MNV was detected in the feces of all the mice at 1 week after cohabitation. In this study, we tried to eliminate and prevent MNV infection from mice by supplying hypochlorite-based disinfectants as an easy and low-cost method. Unfortunately, drinking disinfectants was ineffective, so it is important to keep the facility environment clean by use of effective disinfectants. Also, animals introduced into facilities should be tested as MNV free by quarantine and periodically confirmed as MNV free by microbiological monitoring.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23903059 PMCID: PMC4160944 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.62.237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Anim ISSN: 0007-5124
Primers used to detect MNV by RT-nested PCR
| Primer | Sequence (5’ to 3’) | Polarity1) | Positions2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st PCR | MNoVorf1&2-F5 | CGCTTYGGAACRATGGATGCTG | + | 5001 − 5022 |
| MNoVorf1&2-R2 | AGCCRGTRTACATGGCTGAG | − | 5340 − 5359 | |
| 2nd PCR | MNoVorf1&2-F6 | CGCAGGAACGCTCAGCAGTC | + | 5029 − 5048 |
| MNoVorf1&2-R3 | CRAGRTARGGGTTRAGYCCYG | − | 5312 − 5332 | |
1)+, sense; −, anti-sense. 2)Nucleotide positions correspond to those of the MNV S7 complete genome (AB435514).
Virucidal activities of WAHS, Purelox, and ethanol for MNV
| Disinfectant | pH | Residual chlorine | Reaction Time | Reduction in titer (log10
PFU/ml)1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feces emulsion | |||||
| Absennce | Presence | ||||
| WAHS | 6.0–6.4 | 60 | 0.5 | >5 | 2.3 |
| 1 | >5 | 2.5 | |||
| 5 | >5 | >5 | |||
| Purelox (1:200) | 10.2 | >200 | 0.5 | >5 | >5 |
| 1 | >5 | >5 | |||
| 5 | >5 | ND | |||
| Purelox (1:400) | 9.7 | 150–200 | 0.5 | >5 | >5 |
| 1 | >5 | >5 | |||
| 5 | ND2) | ND | |||
| Purelox (1:600) | 9.5 | 100 | 0.5 | >5 | 2.6 |
| 1 | >5 | 3.8 | |||
| 5 | ND | >5 | |||
| Purelox (1:800) | 9.4 | 70 | 0.5 | >5 | 2.0 |
| 1 | >5 | 2.2 | |||
| 5 | ND | >5 | |||
| Purelox (1:1,000) | 9.3 | 60 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 | 3.8 | 1.4 | |||
| 5 | 4.5 | 2.2 | |||
| 70% Ethanol | 0.5 | >5 | >5 | ||
| 1 | >5 | ND | |||
| 5 | >5 | ND | |||
1)MNV titer was determined by plaque assay. 2)ND, not determined.
Detection of MNV in feces of mice that drank WAHS1) post MNV infection
| Drinking water | Weeks post infection | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| WAHS (n=3) | RT-nested PCR | 3/34) | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| MNV titer3) (log10 PFU/g) | 5.29 ± 0.53 | 3.79 ± 0.34 | 3.69 ± 1.10 | 3.89 ±1.01 | 3.74 ± 0.82 | |
| Control (n=3)2) | RT-nested PCR | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| MNV titer (log10 PFU/g) | 5.52 ± 0.54 | 3.51 ± 0.79 | 3.38 ± 0.57 | 3.77 ± 1.24 | 3.95 ± 0.85 | |
1)Drinking water was changed from 1 week post infection. 2)The drinking water of control mice was not changed to disinfectant. 3)MNV titer was determined by plaque assay. Each value represents the mean ± SD of 3 samples. For calculation of the mean ± SD, titers of samples that did not show any plaque were estimated as the detection limit, 3.0 log10. 4)Each value represents number of positive samples / number of samples examined.
Fig. 1.Agarose gel electrophoresis of RT-nested PCR products. Lane M, DNA marker with the sizes indicated; lane 1, MNV-specific RT-nested PCR product (304 bp) as a positive control; lane 2, RT-nested PCR product using RNA extracted from RAW264.7 cells that were inoculated with inactivated MNV.
Detection of MNV in the intestines of mice that drank WAHS1) at 5 weeks post MNV infection
| Drinking water | Intestine | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duodenum | Jejunum | Cecum | Rectum | ||
| WAHS (n=3) | RT-nested PCR | 0/34) | 1/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 |
| MNV titer3) (log10 PFU/g) | <2.3 | <2.3 | 2.92 ± 0.56 | ND5) | |
| Control (n=3)2) | RT-nested PCR | 2/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 |
| MNV titer (log10 PFU/g) | <2.3 | <2.3 | 2.59 ± 0.76 | ND | |
1)Drinking water was changed from 1 week post infection. 2)The drinking water of control mice was not changed to disinfectant. 3)MNV titer was determined by plaque assay. Each value represents the mean ± SD of 3 samples. 4)Each value represents number of positive samples / number of samples examined. 5)ND, not determined.
Detection of MNV in feces of disinfectant-drinking mice that cohabited with an MNV-infected mouse by RT-nested PCR
| Drinking water | Weeks before | Weeks post cohabitation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| WAHS (n=3) | 2 | 3/33) | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Purelox (1:6,000) (n=3) | 2 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Control (n=3)2) | 2 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| WAHS (n=3) | 4 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Purelox (1:6,000) (n=3) | 4 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
| Control (n=3) | 4 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 3/3 |
1)The drinking water of mice was changed to WAHS or 1:6,000 diluted Purelox 2 or 4 weeks before cohabitation with an MNV-infected mouse. 2)The drinking water of control mice was not changed to disinfectant. 3)Each value represents number of positive samples / number of samples examined.